it goes a lot deeper than simply rich
people<00:00:03.060> in<00:00:03.240> government<00:00:03.360> who<00:00:03.600> don't<00:00:03.720> give<00:00:03.840> a
and I I that sounds extreme but listen
I've<00:00:13.080> got<00:00:13.500> a<00:00:13.620> degree<00:00:13.740> from<00:00:13.980> LLC<00:00:14.340> I've<00:00:14.519> got<00:00:14.639> a
I've got a degree from LLC I've got a
degree<00:00:14.820> from<00:00:15.059> Oxford<00:00:15.420> I've<00:00:15.719> worked<00:00:16.080> I've<00:00:16.320> been
18 years now in many different spaces
my<00:00:24.720> honest<00:00:25.019> opinion<00:00:25.439> is<00:00:25.800> that<00:00:26.100> economics<00:00:26.820> is
I think to think about it and to answer
is<00:00:54.539> quite<00:00:54.660> interesting<00:00:55.020> so<00:00:55.199> so<00:00:55.379> before<00:00:55.620> I
is quite interesting so so before I
start<00:00:55.920> I<00:00:56.160> should<00:00:56.280> say<00:00:56.460> you<00:00:56.579> know<00:00:56.760> I'm<00:00:57.660> I'm<00:00:57.960> not
politician I don't know many politicians
very<00:01:00.480> closely<00:01:00.780> okay<00:01:01.079> so<00:01:01.260> we<00:01:01.440> kind<00:01:01.860> of<00:01:01.920> make
some assumptions about what they're
working<00:01:03.180> with<00:01:03.359> but<00:01:03.660> you<00:01:04.320> know<00:01:04.379> I<00:01:04.500> often<00:01:04.739> say
working with but you know I often say
when<00:01:05.159> I'm<00:01:05.339> asked<00:01:05.820> this<00:01:05.880> question<00:01:06.180> I<00:01:06.720> say<00:01:06.960> well
which then probably anybody watching um
his<00:01:17.159> father<00:01:17.340> was<00:01:17.640> one<00:01:17.760> of<00:01:17.820> the<00:01:17.820> richest<00:01:18.060> men<00:01:18.119> in
he's super super super super super super
rich<00:01:21.119> right<00:01:21.420> so<00:01:21.600> this<00:01:21.960> is<00:01:22.140> the<00:01:22.320> guy<00:01:22.500> in<00:01:22.920> charge
making the decision should be tax the
rich<00:01:26.100> so<00:01:26.340> he's<00:01:26.520> probably<00:01:26.700> not<00:01:26.880> going<00:01:27.000> to<00:01:27.119> make
rich so he's probably not going to make
it<00:01:27.360> right<00:01:27.540> and<00:01:27.780> then<00:01:27.960> the<00:01:28.140> chance<00:01:28.380> that<00:01:28.619> Jeremy
it right and then the chance that Jeremy
Hunt<00:01:29.100> I<00:01:29.280> think<00:01:29.340> he's<00:01:29.400> worth<00:01:29.640> something<00:01:29.820> like<00:01:29.939> I
Hunt I think he's worth something like I
don't<00:01:30.240> know<00:01:30.299> 10<00:01:30.479> 15<00:01:30.659> million<00:01:31.020> pounds<00:01:31.259> also
don't know 10 15 million pounds also
very<00:01:31.920> very<00:01:32.100> wealthy<00:01:32.520> man<00:01:32.640> again<00:01:33.000> much<00:01:33.299> much
he's probably unlikely to do it right
before<00:01:39.119> that<00:01:39.360> Boris<00:01:39.720> Johnson<00:01:39.900> he's<00:01:40.619> going<00:01:40.860> to
before that Boris Johnson he's going to
make<00:01:41.040> millions<00:01:41.340> of<00:01:41.460> pounds<00:01:41.820> he<00:01:42.360> already<00:01:42.540> has
Cameron made 10 million pounds from
Green<00:01:46.320> cell<00:01:46.619> you<00:01:47.340> know<00:01:47.400> within<00:01:47.700> a<00:01:47.820> year<00:01:47.880> of
Green cell you know within a year of
leaving<00:01:48.180> office<00:01:48.420> right<00:01:48.840> so<00:01:49.079> and<00:01:49.380> Tony<00:01:49.680> Blair
leaving office right so and Tony Blair
he<00:01:50.759> must<00:01:50.880> be<00:01:51.000> worth<00:01:51.180> what<00:01:51.360> I<00:01:51.479> don't<00:01:51.600> know<00:01:51.659> 50
he must be worth what I don't know 50
million<00:01:52.259> 100<00:01:52.380> million<00:01:52.740> these<00:01:52.979> guys<00:01:53.040> are<00:01:53.220> super
if the people you put in charge
are<00:01:59.100> very<00:01:59.340> rich<00:01:59.520> or<00:01:59.700> about<00:01:59.939> to<00:02:00.119> become<00:02:00.360> very
are very rich or about to become very
rich<00:02:00.780> you<00:02:01.079> can<00:02:01.200> see<00:02:01.380> there's<00:02:01.619> a<00:02:01.860> pretty
obvious conflict of interest there in
dealing<00:02:04.380> with<00:02:04.500> policies<00:02:04.860> such<00:02:05.040> as<00:02:05.159> should<00:02:05.340> we
dealing with policies such as should we
tax<00:02:05.700> the<00:02:06.119> rich<00:02:06.299> or<00:02:06.420> the<00:02:06.600> very<00:02:06.659> rich<00:02:07.020> more
because they're basically deciding the
policies<00:02:09.660> that<00:02:09.780> will<00:02:09.899> apply<00:02:10.140> to<00:02:10.319> them<00:02:10.500> to
policies that will apply to them to
themselves<00:02:11.280> right<00:02:11.580> so<00:02:12.180> I<00:02:13.020> think<00:02:13.140> that<00:02:13.980> that
within a couple of years we will
probably<00:02:31.319> have<00:02:31.500> a<00:02:31.680> labor<00:02:31.920> government<00:02:32.040> in<00:02:32.280> this
and again you know you could point the
same<00:02:36.720> charge<00:02:36.900> at<00:02:37.680> the<00:02:37.860> labor<00:02:38.160> leadership<00:02:38.400> you
same charge at the labor leadership you
could<00:02:38.760> say<00:02:38.819> these<00:02:39.060> the<00:02:39.360> labor<00:02:39.660> leadership<00:02:39.959> is
could say these the labor leadership is
not<00:02:40.260> as<00:02:40.319> rich<00:02:40.440> as<00:02:40.560> a<00:02:40.680> conservative<00:02:40.980> leadership
not as rich as a conservative leadership
and<00:02:41.940> their<00:02:42.060> donors<00:02:42.420> are<00:02:42.540> not<00:02:42.660> as<00:02:42.780> rich<00:02:42.900> as<00:02:43.019> a
very many relatively wealthy people in
that<00:02:48.599> party<00:02:48.780> and<00:02:49.080> when<00:02:49.379> they<00:02:49.500> leave<00:02:49.620> office
that party and when they leave office
you<00:02:50.099> know<00:02:50.220> Tony<00:02:50.340> Blair<00:02:50.700> for<00:02:50.879> example<00:02:51.000> became
you know Tony Blair for example became
very<00:02:51.540> rich<00:02:51.720> so<00:02:51.900> you<00:02:52.080> know<00:02:52.200> we<00:02:52.319> could<00:02:52.440> point<00:02:52.560> the
there's lots of countries in the world
and<00:02:56.879> there's<00:02:57.000> lots<00:02:57.239> of<00:02:57.300> governments<00:02:57.660> and<00:02:57.780> we
and there's lots of governments and we
have<00:02:58.019> some<00:02:58.200> governments<00:02:58.560> which<00:02:58.739> are<00:02:58.920> sort<00:02:59.040> of
political parties they tend to basically
go<00:03:25.860> and<00:03:26.040> ask<00:03:26.220> economists<00:03:26.879> you<00:03:27.060> know<00:03:27.120> what
go and ask economists you know what
should<00:03:27.420> we<00:03:27.540> do<00:03:27.659> what<00:03:28.080> should<00:03:28.200> we<00:03:28.319> do<00:03:28.500> and
should we do what should we do and
I<00:03:30.000> think<00:03:30.120> the<00:03:30.300> truth<00:03:30.480> is<00:03:30.659> at<00:03:30.900> the<00:03:31.019> moment<00:03:31.260> if
economists you know not Traders people
who've<00:03:37.980> gone<00:03:38.159> to<00:03:38.340> work<00:03:38.519> in<00:03:39.060> civil<00:03:39.480> service<00:03:39.599> or
in government or in think tanks
um<00:03:42.060> what<00:03:42.239> do<00:03:42.360> you<00:03:42.420> think<00:03:42.540> we<00:03:42.599> should<00:03:42.780> do
um what do you think we should do
tax<00:03:44.459> the<00:03:44.760> rich<00:03:44.940> more<00:03:45.239> is<00:03:45.900> still<00:03:46.080> a<00:03:46.260> relatively
about
basically<00:03:55.440> why<00:03:55.739> that<00:03:55.980> is<00:03:56.099> why<00:03:56.459> is<00:03:56.640> that<00:03:57.239> and<00:03:57.599> I
very very very mathematical
um you<00:04:22.380> if<00:04:22.740> you<00:04:22.979> want<00:04:23.040> to<00:04:23.160> do<00:04:23.220> well<00:04:23.400> in<00:04:23.580> it<00:04:23.759> and
we're talking about macroeconomics here
so<00:04:26.040> we're<00:04:26.160> talking<00:04:26.280> about<00:04:26.400> the<00:04:26.520> economies<00:04:26.880> of
so we're talking about the economies of
countries<00:04:27.360> if<00:04:28.020> you<00:04:28.139> want<00:04:28.259> to<00:04:28.380> do<00:04:28.440> well<00:04:28.560> in<00:04:28.740> it
the main thing that you have to be able
to<00:04:32.940> do<00:04:33.060> is<00:04:33.180> to<00:04:33.360> memorize<00:04:33.780> algebra<00:04:34.860> so<00:04:35.520> from
to do is to memorize algebra so from
2017<00:04:36.419> to<00:04:36.600> 2019<00:04:36.900> I<00:04:37.199> did<00:04:37.380> a<00:04:37.500> two-year<00:04:37.800> economics
a macroeconomics module the exam was
three<00:04:46.080> hours<00:04:46.320> and<00:04:47.280> the<00:04:47.460> first<00:04:47.639> two<00:04:48.060> hours<00:04:48.300> is
questions but everybody knows that
everybody<00:04:58.919> gets<00:04:59.340> the<00:04:59.400> same<00:04:59.520> score<00:04:59.639> if<00:04:59.820> they
they are they are hard the first thing
I'll<00:05:09.840> say<00:05:10.020> is<00:05:10.139> they<00:05:10.440> are<00:05:10.680> hard<00:05:10.919> so<00:05:11.759> sometimes<00:05:12.060> I
I'll say is they are hard so sometimes I
maybe<00:05:12.300> give<00:05:12.540> an<00:05:12.600> impression<00:05:12.960> that<00:05:13.080> economists
economics degree is difficult you need
to<00:05:19.800> memorize<00:05:20.580> a<00:05:21.240> lot<00:05:21.300> of<00:05:21.479> algebra<00:05:21.900> and<00:05:22.080> you
to memorize a lot of algebra and you
need<00:05:22.320> to<00:05:22.380> have<00:05:22.500> some<00:05:22.860> kind<00:05:23.039> of<00:05:23.220> understanding
need to have some kind of understanding
of<00:05:24.060> the<00:05:24.180> algebra<00:05:24.479> and<00:05:24.660> how<00:05:24.780> it<00:05:24.900> works<00:05:25.199> how<00:05:25.620> to
manipulate it right it's not easy
but<00:05:29.699> imagine<00:05:29.940> you<00:05:30.780> you<00:05:30.960> have<00:05:31.199> gone<00:05:31.380> into<00:05:31.500> an
but imagine you you have gone into an
economics<00:05:32.160> degree<00:05:32.340> you've<00:05:32.820> got<00:05:32.940> a<00:05:33.120> big<00:05:33.180> exam
particularly complex in terms of theory
in<00:05:52.800> terms<00:05:53.039> of<00:05:53.100> ideas<00:05:53.280> but<00:05:53.940> they're<00:05:54.180> very
in terms of ideas but they're very
complex<00:05:54.660> in<00:05:54.840> terms<00:05:55.020> of<00:05:55.080> algebra<00:05:56.039> and<00:05:56.460> I<00:05:56.580> think
complex in terms of algebra and I think
by<00:05:58.919> the<00:05:59.100> time<00:05:59.160> you've<00:05:59.460> come<00:05:59.639> through<00:05:59.820> sort<00:06:00.240> of
by the time you've come through sort of
you've<00:06:00.960> got<00:06:01.020> your<00:06:01.139> Masters<00:06:01.440> you've<00:06:01.620> got<00:06:01.740> your
you've spent so long working on the
algebra<00:06:23.580> and<00:06:24.300> so<00:06:24.539> little<00:06:24.720> thinking<00:06:25.080> about<00:06:25.199> the
thought is there something missing from
these<00:06:45.180> models<00:06:45.539> and<00:06:46.500> one<00:06:47.400> crucial<00:06:47.639> feature<00:06:48.120> of
agent models so they look at
the<00:07:04.380> total<00:07:04.680> of<00:07:04.860> the<00:07:04.979> economy<00:07:05.280> the<00:07:05.759> aggregate
or the average
and<00:07:08.280> of<00:07:08.520> course<00:07:08.580> when<00:07:08.759> you<00:07:08.880> look<00:07:09.000> at<00:07:09.120> the<00:07:09.240> whole
you're not looking at the distribution
there<00:07:13.319> is<00:07:13.380> no<00:07:13.500> distribution<00:07:13.979> so<00:07:14.580> these<00:07:14.880> guys
there is no distribution so these guys
have<00:07:15.240> spent<00:07:15.539> years<00:07:16.199> and<00:07:16.560> years<00:07:16.860> and<00:07:17.280> years<00:07:17.520> and
their whole life their whole skill set
their<00:07:33.419> whole<00:07:33.599> career<00:07:34.020> is<00:07:34.620> predicated<00:07:35.160> on<00:07:35.580> the
the unbelievably intense memorization of
these<00:07:38.460> models<00:07:38.759> with<00:07:38.940> no<00:07:39.120> inequality<00:07:39.599> in<00:07:39.780> them
models with no inequality in them
and<00:07:49.919> everything<00:07:50.160> you<00:07:50.460> throw<00:07:50.639> at<00:07:50.819> them<00:07:51.000> they
and everything you throw at them they
will<00:07:52.020> instinctively<00:07:52.620> think<00:07:52.800> of<00:07:52.979> in<00:07:53.220> terms<00:07:53.400> of
will instinctively think of in terms of
these<00:07:53.639> models<00:07:53.880> with<00:07:54.000> no<00:07:54.120> inequality<00:07:54.539> in<00:07:54.720> them
because you've studied for years and
years<00:07:59.639> and<00:07:59.880> years<00:08:00.120> and<00:08:00.300> years<00:08:00.539> and<00:08:00.720> years
models right so it's deeply embedded
into<00:08:09.780> them<00:08:10.020> not<00:08:10.319> to<00:08:10.500> think<00:08:10.620> in<00:08:10.800> the<00:08:10.979> economy<00:08:11.340> in
into them not to think in the economy in
terms<00:08:11.880> of<00:08:12.000> inequality<00:08:12.479> and<00:08:12.660> in<00:08:12.840> terms<00:08:13.020> of
that would essentially mean that they
[ __ ]<00:08:22.979> wasted<00:08:23.639> 10<00:08:24.060> years<00:08:24.479> of<00:08:24.780> their<00:08:24.960> life
the the great example of this I've used
it<00:08:35.279> a<00:08:35.339> couple<00:08:35.459> of<00:08:35.580> times<00:08:35.700> before<00:08:35.880> is<00:08:36.060> when<00:08:36.240> I
asked the professor at University at
Oxford<00:08:38.520> why<00:08:38.820> do<00:08:38.940> you<00:08:39.060> think<00:08:39.120> people<00:08:39.360> spent<00:08:40.020> so
Oxford why do you think people spent so
little<00:08:40.380> money<00:08:40.560> after<00:08:40.800> 2008<00:08:41.640> and<00:08:42.180> he<00:08:42.300> said
little money after 2008 and he said
we're<00:08:42.659> not<00:08:42.839> sure<00:08:43.080> but<00:08:43.740> we<00:08:43.919> think<00:08:44.039> it's<00:08:44.159> because
it's totally nonsense to use that as an
explanation<00:08:59.220> for<00:08:59.399> the<00:08:59.580> real<00:08:59.700> world<00:08:59.880> but<00:09:00.540> he's
explanation for the real world but he's
so<00:09:01.440> inculcated<00:09:02.339> he's<00:09:02.640> so<00:09:02.940> deeply<00:09:03.660> bread<00:09:04.019> into
so inculcated he's so deeply bread into
his<00:09:04.440> blood<00:09:04.680> these<00:09:05.100> models<00:09:05.459> he<00:09:06.000> cannot<00:09:06.300> think
his blood these models he cannot think
about<00:09:06.600> the<00:09:06.839> world<00:09:06.959> in<00:09:07.260> any<00:09:07.440> way<00:09:07.620> other<00:09:07.800> than
through these models and it's important
to<00:09:09.420> understand<00:09:09.800> that<00:09:10.800> this<00:09:11.040> is<00:09:11.220> the<00:09:11.459> training
to understand that this is the training
that<00:09:12.120> all<00:09:12.420> economists<00:09:13.019> get<00:09:13.279> and<00:09:14.279> with<00:09:14.880> regards
that all economists get and with regards
to Traders<00:09:15.779> you<00:09:15.959> can<00:09:16.080> be<00:09:16.200> a<00:09:16.380> Trader<00:09:16.680> with<00:09:16.800> an
to Traders you can be a Trader with an
undergrad<00:09:17.339> but<00:09:17.760> if<00:09:17.880> you<00:09:18.000> want<00:09:18.120> to<00:09:18.240> be<00:09:18.360> really
or in government then you need to get
PhD<00:09:24.300> basically<00:09:24.660> so<00:09:24.899> these<00:09:25.140> guys<00:09:25.260> are<00:09:25.500> in
three-year undergrad one or two year
Masters<00:09:29.040> another<00:09:29.339> four<00:09:29.640> or<00:09:29.760> five<00:09:29.820> years<00:09:30.000> PhD
so they've been really really they've
really<00:09:32.940> worked<00:09:33.240> these<00:09:33.480> models<00:09:33.720> for<00:09:33.839> a<00:09:33.959> long
really worked these models for a long
time<00:09:34.140> right<00:09:34.380> it's<00:09:34.620> really<00:09:34.920> a<00:09:35.160> massive<00:09:35.399> part<00:09:35.580> of
who they are so they
simply<00:09:38.459> do<00:09:39.000> not<00:09:39.240> ever<00:09:39.540> think<00:09:39.779> of<00:09:39.959> the<00:09:40.140> world<00:09:40.320> in
the government gives 700 billion pounds
out<00:09:48.959> and<00:09:49.320> no<00:09:49.500> one<00:09:49.620> asks<00:09:49.920> who<00:09:50.100> gets<00:09:50.399> it
because if you don't care about
inequality<00:09:52.740> you<00:09:52.920> don't<00:09:53.100> care<00:09:53.220> who<00:09:53.399> gets<00:09:53.640> it
inequality you don't care who gets it
you<00:09:54.779> know<00:09:54.839> somebody<00:09:55.019> got<00:09:55.380> it<00:09:55.500> but<00:09:55.680> you<00:09:55.740> don't
you know somebody got it but you don't
get<00:09:55.980> who<00:09:56.160> because<00:09:56.339> you<00:09:56.580> just<00:09:56.700> think<00:09:56.820> you're
this leads to exactly
the<00:10:08.459> kind<00:10:08.580> of<00:10:08.700> thing<00:10:08.880> that<00:10:09.300> I<00:10:09.660> mentioned<00:10:10.080> in
the kind of thing that I mentioned in
the<00:10:10.560> video<00:10:10.680> about<00:10:10.860> Jeremy<00:10:11.279> Hunter<00:10:11.399> and<00:10:11.580> black
worsening problem of inequality in the
economy<00:10:19.920> and<00:10:20.459> you<00:10:20.700> had<00:10:20.880> been<00:10:21.000> trained<00:10:21.360> for<00:10:21.660> 10
better at bad outcomes
it's<00:10:31.680> exactly<00:10:32.040> like<00:10:32.220> if<00:10:32.459> you<00:10:32.580> had<00:10:32.700> cancer<00:10:33.000> but
it's exactly like if you had cancer but
you<00:10:33.839> went<00:10:34.260> to<00:10:34.380> a<00:10:34.500> doctor<00:10:34.620> who<00:10:34.860> didn't<00:10:35.040> believe
he'd be like there's nothing wrong with
you<00:10:38.279> but<00:10:39.240> bad<00:10:39.839> things<00:10:39.959> keep<00:10:40.200> happening<00:10:40.560> to<00:10:40.680> you
and you're going to be fine
this<00:10:48.300> is<00:10:48.420> the<00:10:48.540> world<00:10:48.660> that<00:10:48.899> we're<00:10:49.019> in<00:10:49.200> it<00:10:49.440> comes
the state of economics which is
economics<00:10:57.120> is<00:10:57.360> taught<00:10:57.720> to<00:10:58.380> people<00:10:58.560> with<00:10:59.459> no
understanding inequality and then you
add<00:11:04.380> this<00:11:04.560> extra<00:11:04.740> layer<00:11:05.160> on<00:11:05.279> top<00:11:05.399> of<00:11:05.519> it<00:11:05.640> which
you can go and work in a skyscraper over
there<00:11:16.260> and<00:11:16.320> make<00:11:16.440> two<00:11:16.560> million<00:11:16.800> pounds<00:11:17.040> a<00:11:17.160> year
so once you understand that this is the
system<00:11:21.540> that<00:11:21.779> we've<00:11:21.899> made<00:11:22.140> we've<00:11:22.560> developed<00:11:22.800> a
understands the importance of inequality
under<00:11:31.079> the<00:11:31.320> condition<00:11:31.440> that<00:11:31.680> they<00:11:31.860> leave<00:11:32.040> the
will be 10 million pounds
how<00:11:47.459> many<00:11:47.640> people<00:11:48.000> are<00:11:48.959> going<00:11:49.079> to<00:11:49.200> be<00:11:49.320> willing
how many people are going to be willing
to<00:11:49.680> do<00:11:49.860> that<00:11:49.980> not<00:11:50.279> many<00:11:50.459> people<00:11:50.760> right
the economics information that goes to
the<00:11:58.680> government<00:11:58.800> that<00:11:59.339> comes<00:11:59.579> out<00:11:59.640> on<00:11:59.820> the
the government that comes out on the
news<00:12:00.060> that<00:12:00.660> goes<00:12:00.899> to<00:12:00.959> all<00:12:01.079> the<00:12:01.260> new<00:12:01.380> people<00:12:01.560> is
news that goes to all the new people is
substandard<00:12:02.579> almost<00:12:03.000> all<00:12:03.240> of<00:12:03.420> it<00:12:03.839> because<00:12:04.320> if
it wasn't substandard why are they
telling<00:12:06.060> you<00:12:06.180> why<00:12:07.079> are<00:12:07.200> they<00:12:07.380> telling<00:12:07.680> you<00:12:07.740> why
telling you why are they telling you why
are<00:12:08.399> they<00:12:08.519> giving<00:12:08.640> up<00:12:08.820> millions<00:12:09.240> of<00:12:09.360> pounds<00:12:09.600> to
I think the end result is that
in<00:12:17.760> government<00:12:17.940> you<00:12:18.240> get<00:12:18.360> a<00:12:18.480> set<00:12:18.600> of<00:12:18.779> people
trained to understand the problem but
they're<00:12:30.180> [ __ ]<00:12:30.540> well<00:12:30.660> paid<00:12:30.899> to<00:12:31.140> do<00:12:31.260> whatever
Jeremy Hunt Boris Johnson these guys
will<00:12:37.800> make<00:12:37.920> a<00:12:38.100> fortune<00:12:38.399> you<00:12:38.579> know<00:12:38.700> these<00:12:39.060> guys
will make a fortune you know these guys
make<00:12:39.360> a<00:12:39.540> ton<00:12:39.600> of<00:12:39.779> money<00:12:39.899> it<00:12:40.440> doesn't<00:12:40.620> matter<00:12:40.860> if
make a ton of money it doesn't matter if
they<00:12:41.100> fix<00:12:41.220> the<00:12:41.399> problem<00:12:41.579> and<00:12:42.360> the<00:12:42.480> economists
they fix the problem and the economists
who<00:12:43.139> advise<00:12:43.500> them<00:12:43.680> okay<00:12:43.920> they're<00:12:44.160> not<00:12:44.279> going
to be multi-multi-millionaires they're
going<00:12:45.779> to<00:12:45.839> make<00:12:45.959> hundreds<00:12:46.260> of<00:12:46.320> thousands<00:12:46.560> of
going to make hundreds of thousands of
pounds<00:12:46.920> a<00:12:46.980> year<00:12:47.100> they're<00:12:47.579> going<00:12:47.760> to<00:12:47.880> be
comfortable it doesn't matter if their
advice<00:12:49.680> is<00:12:49.860> wrong<00:12:50.579> and<00:12:50.940> anyone<00:12:51.180> who<00:12:51.360> does
advice is wrong and anyone who does
understand<00:12:51.600> can<00:12:51.959> get<00:12:52.079> paid<00:12:52.200> a<00:12:52.380> ton<00:12:52.500> of<00:12:52.620> money
really what is really happening is the
system<00:12:56.579> is<00:12:56.820> is<00:12:57.120> quite<00:12:57.420> rotten<00:12:57.899> at<00:12:58.019> the<00:12:58.139> core<00:12:58.320> in
system is is quite rotten at the core in
in<00:12:59.160> a<00:12:59.459> way<00:12:59.579> that<00:12:59.760> is<00:12:59.880> itself<00:13:00.240> a<00:13:00.420> manifestation
when the rich are going to pay good
economies<00:13:09.120> two<00:13:09.300> million<00:13:09.480> pounds<00:13:09.720> a<00:13:09.779> year<00:13:09.839> to
inequality doesn't just mean you don't
get<00:13:15.420> a<00:13:15.600> house<00:13:15.779> it<00:13:16.500> also<00:13:16.740> means<00:13:16.980> the<00:13:17.279> government
get a house it also means the government
cannot<00:13:18.600> afford<00:13:19.399> good<00:13:20.399> the<00:13:21.180> best<00:13:21.420> people<00:13:21.660> in
cannot afford good the best people in
many<00:13:22.380> cases<00:13:22.680> when<00:13:23.160> you<00:13:23.339> add<00:13:23.519> on<00:13:23.700> to<00:13:23.940> that<00:13:24.120> a
the government could attract people like
me<00:13:43.680> if<00:13:44.519> it<00:13:44.820> was<00:13:45.000> able<00:13:45.420> to<00:13:45.540> identify<00:13:46.260> good
I think it's relevant that someone like
me<00:13:53.339> can<00:13:53.579> walk<00:13:53.760> into<00:13:54.000> Citibank<00:13:54.779> and<00:13:55.019> be<00:13:55.200> famous
internet and okay we're growing now
we're<00:14:01.800> growing<00:14:02.100> now<00:14:02.220> but<00:14:02.339> I'm<00:14:02.459> nowhere<00:14:02.760> near
we're growing now but I'm nowhere near
as<00:14:03.000> famous<00:14:03.120> as<00:14:03.360> I<00:14:03.540> was<00:14:03.660> at<00:14:03.779> Citibank<00:14:04.860> and<00:14:05.279> that
identifying good people
you<00:14:12.899> know<00:14:13.019> we've<00:14:13.380> got<00:14:13.500> a<00:14:13.620> video<00:14:13.740> about<00:14:13.920> June
you know we've got a video about June
2020<00:14:14.700> saying<00:14:15.300> there's<00:14:15.420> going<00:14:15.600> to<00:14:15.600> be<00:14:15.660> a<00:14:15.720> mass
quality of living you know what I mean
that<00:14:24.000> we<00:14:24.600> should<00:14:24.720> be<00:14:24.839> famous<00:14:25.019> on<00:14:25.320> that<00:14:25.440> right
designed
to<00:14:43.860> go<00:14:44.040> and<00:14:44.160> get<00:14:44.279> good<00:14:44.459> people<00:14:44.639> and<00:14:44.940> make<00:14:45.300> them
to go and get good people and make them
on<00:14:45.600> the<00:14:45.720> country<00:14:45.839> nor<00:14:46.680> is<00:14:46.920> the<00:14:47.100> media
in many cases they're almost trying to
rob<00:15:02.040> you<00:15:02.279> because<00:15:02.519> they<00:15:02.820> literally<00:15:03.240> are<00:15:03.480> the
to make professional looking TV shows
they<00:15:08.279> don't<00:15:08.459> give<00:15:08.639> a<00:15:08.760> [ __ ]<00:15:08.880> with<00:15:09.060> their
analysis is good or bad right
they<00:15:11.339> don't<00:15:11.519> put<00:15:11.699> me<00:15:11.820> on<00:15:12.000> there<00:15:12.180> because<00:15:12.600> they
simple as that yeah they don't give okay
do<00:15:17.519> they<00:15:17.579> give<00:15:17.699> a<00:15:17.880> [ __ ]<00:15:17.940> that<00:15:18.120> my<00:15:18.240> analysis<00:15:18.660> is
do they give a [ __ ] that my analysis is
actually<00:15:19.019> right<00:15:19.320> who<00:15:19.620> gives<00:15:19.860> a<00:15:19.980> [ __ ]<00:15:20.220> nobody
nobody in TV cares about right analysis
all<00:15:23.339> they<00:15:23.519> want<00:15:23.639> is<00:15:23.760> it<00:15:23.940> to<00:15:24.000> look<00:15:24.120> good<00:15:24.360> right
they're not incentivized to find good
people<00:15:32.279> and<00:15:32.639> to<00:15:32.940> do<00:15:33.120> good<00:15:33.300> things<00:15:33.540> in<00:15:34.260> most
with their own incentivizations and
everyone<00:15:38.160> is<00:15:38.399> trying<00:15:38.579> to<00:15:38.760> build<00:15:39.600> their<00:15:39.839> own
it goes a lot deeper than simply rich
people<00:15:46.139> in<00:15:46.320> government<00:15:46.500> who<00:15:46.680> don't<00:15:46.800> give<00:15:46.920> a
people in government who don't give a
[ __ ]<00:15:47.639> there<00:15:48.360> is<00:15:48.480> a<00:15:48.660> problem<00:15:48.839> of<00:15:49.320> our<00:15:49.620> Economic
and I I that sounds extreme but listen
I've<00:15:56.220> got<00:15:56.579> a<00:15:56.699> degree<00:15:56.820> from<00:15:57.060> LSC<00:15:57.480> I've<00:15:57.660> got<00:15:57.720> a
I've got a degree from LSC I've got a
degree<00:15:57.899> from<00:15:58.199> Oxford<00:15:58.560> I've<00:15:58.860> worked<00:15:59.220> I've<00:15:59.459> been
degree from Oxford I've worked I've been
in<00:15:59.760> think<00:15:59.880> tanks<00:16:00.300> I've<00:16:00.480> been<00:16:00.660> in<00:16:00.959> the<00:16:01.079> city
18 years now in many different spaces
my<00:16:07.860> honest<00:16:08.100> opinion<00:16:08.519> is<00:16:08.880> that<00:16:09.240> economics<00:16:09.959> is
that most of what they do is a complete
waste<00:16:15.060> of<00:16:15.120> time<00:16:15.300> most<00:16:15.779> of<00:16:15.959> these<00:16:16.139> guys<00:16:16.260> it
waste of time most of these guys it
would<00:16:16.680> be<00:16:16.740> better<00:16:16.920> off<00:16:17.100> if<00:16:17.339> we<00:16:17.519> just<00:16:17.760> sent<00:16:18.240> them
would be better off if we just sent them
out<00:16:18.540> of<00:16:18.660> the<00:16:18.720> country<00:16:18.839> and<00:16:19.019> started<00:16:19.320> again
out of the country and started again
because<00:16:20.399> they<00:16:20.940> are<00:16:21.180> absolutely<00:16:22.139> tied<00:16:22.680> to<00:16:23.579> a
because they are absolutely tied to a
set<00:16:23.880> of<00:16:24.000> models<00:16:24.480> that<00:16:24.779> have<00:16:24.899> no<00:16:25.139> distribution
set of models that have no distribution
in<00:16:25.860> them<00:16:26.040> keep<00:16:26.519> predicting<00:16:26.940> things<00:16:27.120> will<00:16:27.300> get
better things keep getting worse and
they<00:16:29.579> will<00:16:29.699> never<00:16:29.880> figure<00:16:30.120> it<00:16:30.360> out<00:16:30.420> they<00:16:31.079> will
they will never figure it out they will
never<00:16:31.380> figure<00:16:31.560> it<00:16:31.740> out<00:16:31.860> because<00:16:32.160> it<00:16:32.880> is<00:16:33.060> in
for it they're not the guys getting hurt
I<00:16:40.680> always<00:16:40.800> remember<00:16:41.040> when<00:16:41.279> I<00:16:41.399> was<00:16:41.519> at<00:16:41.639> Oxford
I always remember when I was at Oxford
in<00:16:42.839> my<00:16:42.959> mid-year<00:16:43.259> review<00:16:43.440> in<00:16:43.860> this<00:16:44.040> [ __ ]
in my mid-year review in this [ __ ]
castle<00:16:44.579> and<00:16:45.360> these<00:16:45.600> guys<00:16:45.720> saying<00:16:46.019> you<00:16:46.079> know
what do you think of the course and I'm
saying<00:16:47.459> [ __ ]<00:16:47.880> and<00:16:48.180> they're<00:16:48.300> saying<00:16:48.480> well<00:16:48.660> what
I'm talking about economic the economy
is<00:16:52.740> in<00:16:52.860> a<00:16:53.040> disaster<00:16:53.339> and<00:16:53.940> they<00:16:54.060> said<00:16:54.240> to<00:16:54.300> me
is in a disaster and they said to me
what<00:16:54.600> do<00:16:54.779> you<00:16:54.839> mean<00:16:54.959> the<00:16:55.019> economy's<00:16:55.380> getting
but for these guys it [ __ ] is and for
these<00:16:59.279> guys<00:16:59.459> the<00:17:00.060> economy<00:17:00.360> has<00:17:00.600> been<00:17:00.779> getting
these guys the economy has been getting
better<00:17:01.079> for<00:17:01.320> 20<00:17:01.500> years<00:17:01.740> and<00:17:02.279> they<00:17:02.399> will<00:17:02.579> be
better for 20 years and they will be
saying<00:17:02.940> the<00:17:03.000> same<00:17:03.120> thing<00:17:03.240> in<00:17:03.420> 20<00:17:03.540> years<00:17:03.779> when
the country's flooded in poverty because
for<00:17:06.480> them<00:17:06.660> it<00:17:06.900> will<00:17:07.079> get<00:17:07.260> better<00:17:07.679> for<00:17:08.160> them<00:17:08.339> it
will get better so I think
it<00:17:11.819> it<00:17:11.819> has<00:17:12.720> to<00:17:12.959> be<00:17:13.140> it<00:17:13.500> has<00:17:13.679> to<00:17:13.919> come<00:17:14.100> from<00:17:14.579> the
it it has to be it has to come from the
people<00:17:14.880> it<00:17:15.299> has<00:17:15.480> to<00:17:15.660> come<00:17:15.780> from<00:17:15.959> the<00:17:16.079> people<00:17:16.199> it
people it has to come from the people it
has<00:17:16.559> to<00:17:16.679> come<00:17:16.799> from<00:17:16.980> a<00:17:17.240> burning<00:17:18.240> desire<00:17:18.839> and
unflinching demand do something about
the<00:17:22.980> wealth<00:17:23.220> distribution<00:17:23.579> or<00:17:23.819> we<00:17:24.000> will<00:17:24.120> never
the wealth distribution or we will never
vote<00:17:24.480> for<00:17:24.720> you<00:17:24.839> or<00:17:25.020> we<00:17:25.199> will<00:17:25.319> never<00:17:25.500> accept<00:17:25.740> it
vote for you or we will never accept it
we<00:17:26.459> will<00:17:26.640> we<00:17:26.819> will<00:17:27.120> fight<00:17:27.240> you<00:17:27.419> until<00:17:27.540> you<00:17:27.780> give
we will we will fight you until you give
us<00:17:28.079> that<00:17:28.319> thing<00:17:28.439> it<00:17:29.400> has<00:17:29.520> to<00:17:29.700> come<00:17:29.820> from<00:17:30.000> that
us that thing it has to come from that
because<00:17:30.299> the<00:17:30.600> economists<00:17:31.020> are<00:17:31.140> not<00:17:31.320> going<00:17:31.440> to
because the economists are not going to
do<00:17:31.620> it<00:17:31.740> for<00:17:31.860> us<00:17:31.919> it<00:17:32.100> has<00:17:32.220> to<00:17:32.340> come<00:17:32.460> from<00:17:32.640> the
do it for us it has to come from the
people<00:17:32.880> and<00:17:33.120> if<00:17:33.840> we<00:17:33.960> get<00:17:34.140> enough<00:17:34.260> popular
people and if we get enough popular
demand<00:17:34.980> then<00:17:35.220> we<00:17:35.400> can<00:17:35.520> start<00:17:35.640> to<00:17:35.820> challenge
demand then we can start to challenge
the<00:17:36.240> economists<00:17:37.200> but<00:17:37.679> it<00:17:37.860> has<00:17:38.160> to<00:17:38.280> come<00:17:38.400> from
the government doesn't tax rich people
so<00:17:47.580> we<00:17:47.760> have<00:17:47.880> to<00:17:48.000> make<00:17:48.120> them<00:17:48.240> do<00:17:48.419> it<00:17:48.539> we<00:17:48.720> have<00:17:48.900> to
housing could be so much more affordable
wages<00:17:55.559> could<00:17:55.860> be<00:17:55.980> so<00:17:56.160> much<00:17:56.280> higher<00:17:56.700> and<00:17:57.179> we
wages could be so much higher and we
could<00:17:57.419> have<00:17:57.600> so<00:17:57.840> many<00:17:57.960> more<00:17:58.140> options<00:17:58.500> in<00:17:58.980> how
could have so many more options in how
we<00:17:59.280> live<00:17:59.400> our<00:17:59.580> lives<00:17:59.760> some<00:18:00.120> of<00:18:00.299> them<00:18:00.360> put<00:18:00.539> a<00:18:00.660> lot
of money into paying economists and
think<00:18:02.400> thanks<00:18:02.640> to<00:18:02.940> tell<00:18:03.120> you<00:18:03.299> that<00:18:03.780> inequality
think thanks to tell you that inequality
is<00:18:04.440> important<00:18:04.679> for<00:18:04.799> the<00:18:04.980> economy<00:18:05.340> that<00:18:06.120> is<00:18:06.240> not