and also this story this one does divide
the<00:00:03.360> room<00:00:03.600> somewhat<00:00:04.000> a<00:00:04.160> one-off<00:00:04.720> wealth<00:00:05.040> tax
the room somewhat a one-off wealth tax
will<00:00:05.920> be<00:00:06.080> the<00:00:06.240> best<00:00:06.560> way<00:00:06.799> to<00:00:06.960> patch<00:00:07.279> up
wants the wealthy to pay
for<00:00:38.160> covid<00:00:38.559> now<00:00:38.879> an<00:00:39.520> inequality<00:00:40.640> uh<00:00:40.879> is<00:00:41.200> that
right an inequality economist
yes<00:00:43.840> that's<00:00:44.000> right<00:00:44.239> yeah<00:00:44.480> afternoon<00:00:45.039> gary<00:00:45.360> the
that would be a curious job to have
wouldn't<00:00:51.920> it<00:00:52.320> um<00:00:52.640> but<00:00:52.879> you're<00:00:53.280> an<00:00:53.360> economist
issues of inequality and i said at the
beginning<00:00:57.120> of<00:00:57.199> this<00:00:57.360> gary<00:00:57.680> or<00:00:57.760> just<00:00:57.920> before
beginning of this gary or just before
the<00:00:58.399> news<00:00:58.719> this<00:00:58.960> one<00:00:59.199> divides<00:00:59.680> me<00:00:59.920> somewhat
persuasive and seductive the argument is
you<00:01:06.799> know<00:01:06.880> if<00:01:06.960> somebody<00:01:07.200> is<00:01:07.280> worth<00:01:07.520> a<00:01:07.600> few<00:01:07.840> quid
you know if somebody is worth a few quid
it's<00:01:08.799> a<00:01:08.960> one-off<00:01:09.439> tax<00:01:09.840> then<00:01:10.400> you<00:01:10.479> know<00:01:10.799> why<00:01:11.119> not
it's not going to be forever
you<00:01:12.799> could<00:01:12.960> argue<00:01:13.200> it's<00:01:13.360> in<00:01:13.439> their<00:01:13.680> interest
you could argue it's in their interest
as<00:01:14.240> well<00:01:14.479> long<00:01:14.640> term<00:01:15.360> uh<00:01:15.439> but<00:01:15.600> there's<00:01:15.840> another
as well long term uh but there's another
part<00:01:16.240> of<00:01:16.320> it<00:01:16.400> i<00:01:16.479> think<00:01:16.640> well<00:01:16.720> if<00:01:16.880> you<00:01:16.960> always<00:01:17.200> go
cap in hand to rich people
you<00:01:19.040> could<00:01:19.200> play<00:01:19.439> that<00:01:19.600> game<00:01:19.920> every<00:01:20.240> day<00:01:20.400> of
you could play that game every day of
the<00:01:20.640> week<00:01:20.880> that<00:01:21.040> there's<00:01:21.360> any<00:01:21.600> kind<00:01:21.840> of<00:01:21.920> crisis
in the report a lot of the uh
sir<00:01:27.759> some<00:01:27.920> economists<00:01:28.400> at<00:01:28.560> the<00:01:28.640> london<00:01:28.880> school
sir some economists at the london school
of<00:01:29.119> economics<00:01:29.520> and<00:01:29.600> a<00:01:29.680> group<00:01:29.920> of<00:01:30.159> lawyers<00:01:30.479> and
tax accounts have looked at this
um<00:01:32.799> yeah<00:01:33.360> there<00:01:33.520> is<00:01:33.680> um<00:01:34.000> they've<00:01:34.240> addressed
that in the report
i<00:01:35.520> think<00:01:35.840> the<00:01:35.920> thing<00:01:36.159> we<00:01:36.240> need<00:01:36.400> to<00:01:36.479> consider
i think the thing we need to consider
here<00:01:36.960> is<00:01:37.360> there's<00:01:37.600> a<00:01:37.759> massive<00:01:38.159> increase<00:01:38.479> as
to the global crisis
it's<00:01:41.680> coming<00:01:41.920> up<00:01:42.000> to<00:01:42.159> half<00:01:42.399> a<00:01:42.479> trillion<00:01:42.880> pounds
just from this year
um<00:01:45.600> something<00:01:45.920> has<00:01:46.079> to<00:01:46.159> be<00:01:46.240> done<00:01:46.399> about<00:01:46.640> that
it will have to be addressed
um<00:01:48.720> at<00:01:48.799> the<00:01:48.960> moment<00:01:49.520> the<00:01:49.759> very<00:01:50.000> richest<00:01:50.399> in<00:01:50.560> our
i mean in terms of
tax<00:02:11.360> thresholds<00:02:11.920> just<00:02:12.239> i<00:02:12.319> mean<00:02:12.480> you<00:02:12.560> will<00:02:12.720> know
a bit about this gary you've
you<00:02:14.560> did<00:02:14.720> well<00:02:14.959> in<00:02:15.040> the<00:02:15.200> city<00:02:16.080> and<00:02:16.480> you've
you did well in the city and you've
earned<00:02:16.959> a<00:02:17.040> few<00:02:17.280> quid<00:02:17.520> and<00:02:17.599> that's<00:02:17.840> fabulous
earned a few quid and that's fabulous
what<00:02:19.040> happens<00:02:19.520> in<00:02:19.680> terms<00:02:19.920> of<00:02:20.080> taxation<00:02:21.280> once
well i think the top rate of income tax
at<00:02:27.920> the<00:02:28.000> moment<00:02:28.239> is<00:02:28.319> 45<00:02:29.200> so<00:02:29.360> that<00:02:29.440> doesn't
there was temporarily a fifty percent
rate<00:02:39.519> tax<00:02:39.840> that's<00:02:40.000> right<00:02:40.239> at<00:02:40.319> the<00:02:40.400> moment<00:02:40.720> the
top rate is back down to forty five
percent<00:02:42.959> so<00:02:43.200> it's<00:02:43.280> still<00:02:43.440> forty<00:02:43.680> five<00:02:43.840> percent
yeah but what's important to realize is
that<00:02:47.440> tax<00:02:47.760> gets<00:02:48.080> charged<00:02:48.400> on<00:02:48.560> worked<00:02:48.959> income
that tax gets charged on worked income
but<00:02:49.599> the<00:02:49.680> very<00:02:49.920> richest<00:02:50.319> people<00:02:50.640> they<00:02:50.800> make<00:02:50.959> a
but the very richest people they make a
lot<00:02:51.200> of<00:02:51.280> their<00:02:51.519> income<00:02:51.920> often<00:02:52.400> most<00:02:52.720> of<00:02:52.800> their
lot of their income often most of their
income<00:02:53.280> in<00:02:53.360> the<00:02:53.440> case<00:02:53.680> of<00:02:53.760> the<00:02:53.840> richest
income in the case of the richest
in<00:02:54.879> ways<00:02:55.120> that<00:02:55.280> is<00:02:55.440> not<00:02:55.680> through<00:02:55.840> working<00:02:56.319> for
and these methods of income are taxed
often<00:03:01.519> a<00:03:01.599> lot<00:03:01.840> less<00:03:02.159> and<00:03:02.239> some<00:03:02.400> of<00:03:02.480> these<00:03:02.640> guys
will be paying
less<00:03:03.920> than<00:03:04.080> 20<00:03:04.720> tax<00:03:05.200> and<00:03:05.280> they<00:03:05.440> may<00:03:05.599> even<00:03:05.760> be
making billions in income
yeah<00:03:07.599> so<00:03:07.760> there<00:03:07.840> comes<00:03:08.080> a<00:03:08.159> question<00:03:08.400> where<00:03:08.560> you
yeah so there comes a question where you
have<00:03:08.800> to<00:03:08.959> ask<00:03:09.280> why<00:03:09.599> are<00:03:09.760> people<00:03:10.000> who<00:03:10.159> are
yeah and in terms of your own situation
i<00:03:18.800> mean<00:03:19.200> you've<00:03:19.360> done<00:03:19.599> well<00:03:19.760> i<00:03:19.840> don't<00:03:20.080> think
i mean you've done well i don't think
you're<00:03:20.400> making<00:03:20.720> nine<00:03:20.959> billion<00:03:21.360> quid<00:03:21.599> gary<00:03:21.920> but
you're making nine billion quid gary but
um<00:03:22.720> no<00:03:23.440> not<00:03:23.680> nonetheless<00:03:24.400> you<00:03:24.560> would<00:03:24.799> be
prepared to pay more
i'll<00:03:27.280> tell<00:03:27.440> you<00:03:27.519> what<00:03:27.840> at<00:03:28.000> the<00:03:28.080> moment<00:03:28.400> in<00:03:28.480> this
multi-billionaire and his wife is
estimated<00:03:34.319> to<00:03:34.400> worth<00:03:34.640> about<00:03:34.720> half<00:03:34.959> a<00:03:35.040> billion
estimated to worth about half a billion
pounds<00:03:36.080> if<00:03:36.239> rishi<00:03:36.560> sunk<00:03:36.879> pays<00:03:37.200> i'll<00:03:37.440> pay
pounds if rishi sunk pays i'll pay
but<00:03:39.280> then<00:03:39.440> rishi<00:03:39.760> sooner<00:03:40.080> might<00:03:40.319> say<00:03:40.480> well
but then rishi sooner might say well
okay<00:03:41.040> that's<00:03:41.280> all<00:03:41.440> very<00:03:41.680> well<00:03:42.000> but<00:03:42.159> he
okay that's all very well but he
shouldn't<00:03:42.560> be<00:03:42.720> judged<00:03:43.120> on<00:03:43.280> his<00:03:43.519> spouse<00:03:43.920> and
then then you will as well
how<00:03:53.680> would<00:03:53.920> you<00:03:54.239> i<00:03:54.319> mean<00:03:54.480> would<00:03:54.720> you<00:03:54.959> just<00:03:55.519> have
payment do you think that would work or
do<00:03:59.040> you<00:03:59.120> think<00:03:59.360> there<00:03:59.519> should<00:03:59.680> be<00:03:59.920> a
um a a kind of an increase
in<00:04:04.319> the<00:04:04.720> in<00:04:04.879> the<00:04:05.040> basic<00:04:05.519> rates<00:04:05.760> of<00:04:05.920> income<00:04:06.159> tax
in the in the basic rates of income tax
because<00:04:06.640> the<00:04:06.959> the<00:04:07.120> smart<00:04:07.360> money<00:04:07.760> always<00:04:08.080> says
gary as you know
uh<00:04:09.680> that<00:04:09.840> if<00:04:10.000> you<00:04:10.159> up<00:04:10.400> it<00:04:10.480> to<00:04:10.640> 50<00:04:11.280> and<00:04:11.439> i<00:04:11.680> believe
evidence for this when gordon brown had
his<00:04:15.200> sort<00:04:15.360> of<00:04:15.439> five<00:04:15.680> minutes<00:04:16.000> at<00:04:16.160> the<00:04:16.239> 50
his sort of five minutes at the 50
percent<00:04:16.959> rate<00:04:17.120> of<00:04:17.280> it<00:04:17.359> this<00:04:17.519> is<00:04:17.600> just<00:04:17.840> income
it
you<00:04:25.680> know<00:04:25.840> i<00:04:26.000> really<00:04:26.160> want<00:04:26.320> to<00:04:27.280> try<00:04:27.440> and<00:04:27.520> be
there's a difference here between what
these<00:04:31.040> guys<00:04:31.199> are<00:04:31.280> doing<00:04:31.520> in<00:04:31.600> this<00:04:31.759> report<00:04:32.080> is
accumulating huge amounts of wealth and
their<00:04:44.080> wealth<00:04:44.320> is<00:04:44.400> just<00:04:44.560> getting<00:04:44.720> bigger<00:04:45.040> and
working like
you<00:04:49.040> do<00:04:49.280> or<00:04:49.360> like<00:04:49.600> i<00:04:49.759> did<00:04:49.840> when<00:04:50.000> i<00:04:50.080> was<00:04:50.240> working
you do or like i did when i was working
so<00:04:51.520> it's<00:04:51.759> we're<00:04:51.919> not<00:04:52.080> talking<00:04:52.400> about<00:04:52.560> taxing
wealth over generations and often
don't<00:04:59.600> get<00:04:59.759> their<00:04:59.919> income<00:05:00.160> through<00:05:00.400> work<00:05:00.639> so
don't get their income through work so
it's<00:05:01.199> not<00:05:01.360> really<00:05:01.600> about<00:05:01.759> what<00:05:02.000> level<00:05:02.240> of
income tax it's about
do<00:05:03.759> we<00:05:04.000> get<00:05:04.240> the<00:05:04.400> super<00:05:04.720> super<00:05:04.960> rich<00:05:05.199> to<00:05:05.280> pay<00:05:05.520> at
all yeah because often
right<00:05:07.199> now<00:05:07.440> they're<00:05:07.600> not<00:05:07.759> paying<00:05:08.000> all<00:05:08.240> yeah<00:05:08.400> so
right now they're not paying all yeah so
it's<00:05:08.720> a<00:05:08.800> kind<00:05:08.880> of<00:05:08.960> misnomer<00:05:09.440> really<00:05:09.680> the<00:05:09.840> idea
that
we<00:05:10.560> talk<00:05:10.720> about<00:05:10.960> income<00:05:11.199> tax<00:05:11.440> and<00:05:11.520> we<00:05:11.680> kind<00:05:11.840> of
obsess on that but actually
the<00:05:13.840> real<00:05:14.400> big<00:05:14.800> bunch<00:05:15.280> comes<00:05:15.520> from<00:05:15.759> elsewhere
those pots those investments it's those
kind<00:05:20.160> of<00:05:20.320> areas<00:05:20.720> yeah<00:05:21.039> it's<00:05:21.199> a<00:05:21.280> choice<00:05:21.600> in<00:05:21.680> a
you know there's a massive debt here
it's<00:05:24.400> increased<00:05:24.720> huge<00:05:25.199> somebody<00:05:25.520> has<00:05:25.600> to<00:05:25.759> pay
and in a sense the government has to
choose<00:05:28.080> do<00:05:28.240> we<00:05:28.320> go<00:05:28.479> to<00:05:28.639> the<00:05:28.720> super<00:05:29.039> rich
like for example the chancellor's wife
or<00:05:31.919> do<00:05:32.080> we<00:05:32.240> go<00:05:32.400> to<00:05:32.479> people<00:05:32.720> who<00:05:32.880> are<00:05:32.960> working
or do we go to people who are working
yeah<00:05:33.759> and<00:05:34.560> at<00:05:34.720> the<00:05:34.800> moment<00:05:35.120> i've<00:05:35.360> worked<00:05:35.840> and
i've paid a lot of tax
but<00:05:37.600> a<00:05:37.680> lot<00:05:37.840> of<00:05:37.919> these<00:05:38.000> guys<00:05:38.160> who<00:05:38.320> are<00:05:38.400> a<00:05:38.400> lot
but a lot of these guys who are a lot
richer<00:05:38.800> than<00:05:38.880> me<00:05:39.120> many<00:05:39.360> many<00:05:39.600> many<00:05:39.840> times
richer than me many many many times
richer<00:05:40.240> than<00:05:40.320> me<00:05:40.560> and<00:05:40.720> i<00:05:40.800> presume<00:05:41.280> you<00:05:41.440> as<00:05:41.520> well
richer than me and i presume you as well
are<00:05:42.160> not<00:05:42.320> paying<00:05:42.560> anything<00:05:42.880> and<00:05:43.199> it's<00:05:43.360> not
are not paying anything and it's not
fair<00:05:43.840> and<00:05:43.919> it's<00:05:44.080> damaging<00:05:44.479> to<00:05:44.560> the<00:05:44.639> economy
fair and it's damaging to the economy
because<00:05:45.360> if<00:05:45.440> you<00:05:45.520> squeeze<00:05:45.840> the<00:05:45.919> middle<00:05:46.160> class
because if you squeeze the middle class
then<00:05:47.039> there's<00:05:47.199> no<00:05:47.360> spending<00:05:47.840> you<00:05:47.919> know<00:05:48.240> yeah
wish your next wife is not going to keep
the<00:05:49.840> whole<00:05:50.000> economy<00:05:50.400> alive<00:05:50.720> we<00:05:50.800> need<00:05:50.960> to<00:05:51.039> tax
they would say it's not
the<00:05:57.759> right<00:05:57.919> thing<00:05:58.160> to<00:05:58.319> do<00:05:59.280> and<00:05:59.440> we<00:05:59.520> can<00:05:59.680> argue
father-in-law is a multi-billionaire the
government<00:06:17.360> might<00:06:17.520> say<00:06:17.680> something<00:06:18.000> like<00:06:18.160> that
government might say something like that
but<00:06:18.960> um<00:06:19.520> the<00:06:19.680> work<00:06:19.919> that<00:06:20.080> the<00:06:20.160> economists<00:06:20.720> and
but um the work that the economists and
the<00:06:20.880> various<00:06:21.280> people<00:06:21.520> on<00:06:21.600> this<00:06:21.680> panel<00:06:22.000> have
work we've shown you how you can do it
we've<00:06:26.319> shown<00:06:26.479> you<00:06:26.639> how<00:06:26.720> it<00:06:26.800> can<00:06:26.960> work<00:06:27.120> and
you know the economists are putting the
work<00:06:31.680> in<00:06:31.919> to<00:06:32.080> show<00:06:32.240> how<00:06:32.479> you<00:06:32.560> can<00:06:32.720> do<00:06:32.960> it
work in to show how you can do it
we<00:06:33.520> need<00:06:33.680> the<00:06:33.759> government<00:06:34.080> to<00:06:34.240> come<00:06:34.400> on<00:06:34.479> board
we need the government to come on board
and<00:06:34.880> say<00:06:35.039> look<00:06:35.520> we<00:06:35.759> are<00:06:35.840> committed<00:06:36.160> to<00:06:36.240> making
pay as well and the economists will work
with<00:06:39.360> them<00:06:39.520> i'll<00:06:39.680> work<00:06:39.840> with<00:06:40.000> them<00:06:40.080> for<00:06:40.240> free
with them i'll work with them for free
look<00:06:40.639> if<00:06:40.800> they<00:06:40.880> want<00:06:41.039> to<00:06:41.120> call<00:06:41.280> me<00:06:41.440> up<00:06:41.600> i'll
look if they want to call me up i'll
work<00:06:41.919> with<00:06:42.080> them<00:06:42.240> i'll<00:06:42.400> tell<00:06:42.560> them<00:06:42.639> how<00:06:42.800> to<00:06:42.880> do
it
but<00:06:43.919> we<00:06:44.080> need<00:06:44.160> to<00:06:44.240> know<00:06:44.400> they're<00:06:44.560> on<00:06:44.720> side<00:06:45.039> and
but we need to know they're on side and
in<00:06:45.360> theory<00:06:45.680> they're<00:06:45.840> on<00:06:45.919> board<00:06:46.160> with<00:06:46.240> making
like jacob rees-mogg actually pay their
way<00:06:51.120> and<00:06:51.280> it's<00:06:51.520> not<00:06:51.759> just<00:06:52.080> put<00:06:52.240> on<00:06:52.319> the
hard-working people of this country
good<00:06:54.160> work<00:06:54.400> gary<00:06:54.800> thank<00:06:55.039> you<00:06:55.280> gary<00:06:55.599> stevenson