Wealth InequalityEnough is EnoughTax Wealth Not WorkEconomics of CovidRich get RicherPoor get PoorerEconomics ExplainedTax the RichEnd AusterityBillionairePoverty
from the working classes away from
Ordinary<00:00:07.120> People<00:00:07.520> towards<00:00:08.000> the<00:00:08.080> rich<00:00:08.360> if<00:00:08.440> you
don't stop that living standards will
decrease<00:00:10.120> right<00:00:10.280> so<00:00:10.679> the<00:00:10.840> two<00:00:11.040> questions<00:00:11.360> are
decrease right so the two questions are
one<00:00:11.960> how<00:00:12.080> do<00:00:12.240> we<00:00:12.480> effectively<00:00:13.080> stop<00:00:13.440> the<00:00:13.559> flood
one how do we effectively stop the flood
of<00:00:14.080> wealth<00:00:14.639> away<00:00:14.839> from<00:00:14.960> the<00:00:15.040> middle<00:00:15.360> class
it's a technical question number two
politically<00:00:18.760> how<00:00:18.840> do<00:00:18.960> we<00:00:19.039> build<00:00:19.240> support<00:00:19.520> for
politically how do we build support for
it<00:00:20.240> because<00:00:20.480> the<00:00:20.600> truth<00:00:20.840> is<00:00:21.039> I<00:00:21.199> actually<00:00:21.480> think
it because the truth is I actually think
there's<00:00:22.160> probably<00:00:22.560> you<00:00:22.680> know<00:00:23.080> 10<00:00:23.439> 20<00:00:24.199> you
different ways to effectively get that
wealth<00:00:27.160> back<00:00:27.679> from<00:00:27.840> the<00:00:27.960> rich<00:00:28.160> to<00:00:28.279> the<00:00:28.400> work<00:00:28.800> I
don't think the technical question is
the<00:00:30.039> problem<00:00:30.439> I<00:00:30.599> always<00:00:30.800> point<00:00:31.000> back<00:00:31.119> to<00:00:31.240> Roman
the problem I always point back to Roman
Abramovic<00:00:32.439> when<00:00:32.599> we<00:00:32.719> decided<00:00:33.079> we<00:00:33.200> want<00:00:33.320> to<00:00:33.399> tax
Abramovic when we decided we want to tax
this<00:00:33.840> one<00:00:34.040> rich<00:00:34.280> guy<00:00:34.760> turns<00:00:35.000> out<00:00:35.160> we
this one rich guy turns out we
can<00:00:35.879> turns<00:00:36.120> out<00:00:36.280> he's<00:00:36.440> not<00:00:36.600> Gandalf<00:00:37.120> he's<00:00:37.280> not
magic he owns Chelsea Football
Club<00:00:39.680> you<00:00:39.800> know<00:00:39.960> we<00:00:40.079> can<00:00:40.200> take<00:00:40.360> the<00:00:40.440> world's
Club you know we can take the world's
back<00:00:41.800> I<00:00:41.920> don't<00:00:42.079> think<00:00:42.239> the<00:00:42.399> question<00:00:42.680> the
the problem is getting public support
for<00:00:46.760> it<00:00:47.320> if<00:00:47.440> we<00:00:47.559> lose<00:00:47.800> the<00:00:47.920> battle<00:00:48.120> for<00:00:48.239> hearts
for it if we lose the battle for hearts
and<00:00:48.600> Minds<00:00:49.600> you<00:00:49.920> you<00:00:50.039> are<00:00:50.199> seeing<00:00:50.559> what<00:00:50.680> will