the<00:00:00.599> conservative<00:00:01.020> party<00:00:01.260> kind<00:00:01.620> of<00:00:01.680> pretended

the conservative party kind of pretended

the conservative party kind of pretended to<00:00:02.159> be<00:00:02.280> ideological<00:00:02.760> about<00:00:02.940> austerity<00:00:03.540> but<00:00:03.840> if

to be ideological about austerity but if

to be ideological about austerity but if you<00:00:04.080> actually<00:00:04.200> look<00:00:04.380> at<00:00:04.500> their<00:00:04.620> behaviors<00:00:05.040> but

you actually look at their behaviors but

you actually look at their behaviors but they<00:00:05.819> appear<00:00:06.060> to<00:00:06.120> be<00:00:06.240> ideological<00:00:06.720> about<00:00:06.899> is

they appear to be ideological about is

they appear to be ideological about is increasing<00:00:07.620> inequality<00:00:08.099> because

increasing inequality because

increasing inequality because they<00:00:10.260> were<00:00:10.380> anti-austerity<00:00:11.160> uh<00:00:12.120> sorry<00:00:12.300> they

they were anti-austerity uh sorry they

they were anti-austerity uh sorry they were<00:00:12.599> anti-deficit<00:00:13.320> when<00:00:13.860> a<00:00:14.040> deficit<00:00:14.460> meant<00:00:14.880> a

were anti-deficit when a deficit meant a

were anti-deficit when a deficit meant a welfare<00:00:15.780> state<00:00:15.960> when<00:00:16.859> a<00:00:17.039> deficit<00:00:17.460> meant<00:00:17.760> a

welfare state when a deficit meant a

welfare state when a deficit meant a well-funded<00:00:18.240> education<00:00:18.539> system<00:00:18.720> a<00:00:18.960> welfare

well-funded education system a welfare

well-funded education system a welfare NHS<00:00:19.619> wealth<00:00:19.920> under<00:00:20.100> local<00:00:20.279> councils<00:00:20.820> then

NHS wealth under local councils then

NHS wealth under local councils then they<00:00:21.480> were<00:00:21.600> anti-deficits<00:00:22.380> when<00:00:22.680> deficits

they were anti-deficits when deficits

they were anti-deficits when deficits meant<00:00:23.640> money<00:00:24.000> to<00:00:24.300> communities<00:00:24.840> the<00:00:25.140> people<00:00:25.320> to

meant money to communities the people to

meant money to communities the people to Services<00:00:25.800> they<00:00:26.220> were<00:00:26.340> anti-deficit<00:00:27.060> but<00:00:27.660> when

Services they were anti-deficit but when

Services they were anti-deficit but when a<00:00:28.019> deficit<00:00:28.439> means<00:00:28.680> tax<00:00:29.160> cuts<00:00:29.519> for<00:00:29.640> the<00:00:29.820> rich

a deficit means tax cuts for the rich

a deficit means tax cuts for the rich tax<00:00:30.539> cuts<00:00:30.960> for<00:00:31.080> Bankers<00:00:31.439> then<00:00:31.859> suddenly

tax cuts for Bankers then suddenly

tax cuts for Bankers then suddenly they're<00:00:32.460> Pro<00:00:32.700> deficit<00:00:33.180> so<00:00:33.780> I<00:00:33.899> think<00:00:34.079> and<00:00:34.800> if

they're Pro deficit so I think and if

they're Pro deficit so I think and if you<00:00:35.160> if<00:00:35.340> you<00:00:35.579> look<00:00:35.700> at<00:00:35.880> what's<00:00:36.059> happened<00:00:36.300> to

you if you look at what's happened to

you if you look at what's happened to inequality<00:00:37.020> in<00:00:37.260> the<00:00:37.440> last<00:00:37.559> 15<00:00:37.920> 20<00:00:38.340> years<00:00:38.579> you

inequality in the last 15 20 years you

inequality in the last 15 20 years you know<00:00:39.480> the<00:00:40.020> conservative<00:00:40.379> party<00:00:40.620> happened<00:00:40.860> to

know the conservative party happened to

know the conservative party happened to move<00:00:41.219> this<00:00:41.460> way<00:00:41.579> and<00:00:41.700> that<00:00:41.940> but<00:00:42.360> they<00:00:42.660> are

move this way and that but they are

move this way and that but they are consistently<00:00:43.800> massively<00:00:44.640> increasing

consistently massively increasing

consistently massively increasing inequality<00:00:45.600> and<00:00:46.379> you<00:00:46.800> know<00:00:46.860> I<00:00:47.040> would

inequality and you know I would

inequality and you know I would encourage<00:00:47.520> the<00:00:47.700> labor<00:00:48.000> party<00:00:48.120> and<00:00:48.300> people<00:00:48.480> on

encourage the labor party and people on

encourage the labor party and people on the<00:00:48.780> left<00:00:48.899> to<00:00:49.500> come<00:00:49.800> back<00:00:49.980> and<00:00:50.760> fight<00:00:51.000> that<00:00:51.300> by

the left to come back and fight that by

the left to come back and fight that by having<00:00:52.020> a<00:00:52.680> more

having a more

having a more an<00:00:54.360> understanding<00:00:54.899> of<00:00:55.079> the<00:00:55.260> importance<00:00:55.559> of

an understanding of the importance of

an understanding of the importance of wealth<00:00:56.039> and<00:00:56.160> wealth<00:00:56.399> distribution<00:00:56.699> and<00:00:56.940> who

wealth and wealth distribution and who

wealth and wealth distribution and who has<00:00:57.239> it<00:00:57.420> because