Wealth InequalityEnough is EnoughTax Wealth Not WorkEconomics of CovidRich get RicherPoor get PoorerEconomics ExplainedTax the RichEnd AusterityBillionairePoverty
different groups of people these
different<00:00:13.599> groups<00:00:13.920> of<00:00:14.160> voters<00:00:14.799> are<00:00:15.040> able<00:00:15.360> to
do aggressive and relentless pursuit of
of<00:00:18.640> unity<00:00:18.880> and<00:00:19.119> common<00:00:19.359> ground.<00:00:19.840> It's<00:00:20.080> as
of unity and common ground. It's as
simple<00:00:20.480> as<00:00:20.640> that.<00:00:20.960> Basically<00:00:21.760> um<00:00:22.160> we<00:00:22.480> have
punishes division. What will probably
happen<00:00:33.440> in<00:00:33.680> the<00:00:33.840> next<00:00:34.079> election<00:00:35.280> is<00:00:35.600> that
happen in the next election is that
reform<00:00:36.399> will<00:00:36.719> win<00:00:37.280> an<00:00:37.520> overall<00:00:37.840> majority<00:00:38.640> and
reform will win an overall majority and
that<00:00:39.200> will<00:00:39.360> be<00:00:39.600> simply<00:00:40.000> because<00:00:41.120> the<00:00:41.360> the
that will be simply because the the
people<00:00:42.239> and<00:00:42.480> the<00:00:42.640> the<00:00:42.960> politicians<00:00:43.520> in<00:00:43.760> this
people and the the politicians in this
country<00:00:44.239> who<00:00:44.559> do<00:00:44.719> not<00:00:44.879> support<00:00:45.120> reform<00:00:46.160> are
country who do not support reform are
divided.<00:00:47.360> So<00:00:47.600> whether<00:00:48.000> reform<00:00:49.039> win<00:00:49.280> or<00:00:49.520> not<00:00:49.840> is
divided. So whether reform win or not is
basically<00:00:50.559> a<00:00:50.879> question<00:00:51.120> of<00:00:52.079> will<00:00:52.399> the<00:00:52.640> center
basically a question of will the center
and<00:00:53.600> will<00:00:53.840> the<00:00:54.000> left<00:00:54.879> be<00:00:55.120> able<00:00:56.160> to<00:00:56.960> be
aggressive and relentless in their
pursuit<00:00:58.800> of<00:00:58.960> common<00:00:59.280> ground.<00:00:59.760> And<00:01:00.160> um<00:01:01.520> I<00:01:01.760> would
pursuit of common ground. And um I would
love<00:01:02.480> for<00:01:02.800> them<00:01:03.039> to<00:01:04.239> unite<00:01:04.799> on<00:01:05.040> the<00:01:05.280> issues
love for them to unite on the issues
which<00:01:05.840> they<00:01:06.000> have<00:01:06.159> in<00:01:06.320> common<00:01:06.880> which<00:01:07.119> I<00:01:07.280> would
which they have in common which I would
like<00:01:07.680> to<00:01:07.840> believe<00:01:08.159> are<00:01:08.479> fixing<00:01:08.799> the<00:01:09.040> economy,
dealing with inequality, dealing with an
unfair<00:01:12.720> taxation<00:01:13.200> system.<00:01:14.479> If<00:01:14.799> they<00:01:15.040> are<00:01:15.280> able
to be sensible, get their heads
together,<00:01:18.320> focus<00:01:18.640> on<00:01:18.799> the<00:01:18.960> message<00:01:19.119> that<00:01:19.360> will
salience of their opponents, then they
could<00:01:34.479> win.<00:01:34.799> If<00:01:34.960> they're<00:01:35.200> divided,<00:01:35.680> they<00:01:35.920> will