← Back to all transcripts

The far right will win if we remain divided

September 19, 2025
Wealth Inequality Enough is Enough Tax Wealth Not Work Economics of Covid Rich get Richer Poor get Poorer Economics Explained Tax the Rich End Austerity Billionaire Poverty
00:00:00

The<00:00:00.480> truth<00:00:00.719> is<00:00:01.360> we<00:00:01.600> are<00:00:01.760> going<00:00:01.920> into<00:00:02.159> the<00:00:02.320> next

00:00:02

The truth is we are going into the next

00:00:02

The truth is we are going into the next election.<00:00:03.280> Reform<00:00:03.679> will<00:00:03.840> be<00:00:04.000> strong

00:00:04

election. Reform will be strong

00:00:04

election. Reform will be strong favorites<00:00:04.960> and<00:00:05.200> really<00:00:05.920> whether<00:00:06.319> reform<00:00:06.720> win

00:00:06

favorites and really whether reform win

00:00:06

favorites and really whether reform win or<00:00:07.120> not<00:00:07.520> will<00:00:07.839> be<00:00:08.080> decided<00:00:08.960> by<00:00:09.200> whether<00:00:09.519> these

00:00:09

or not will be decided by whether these

00:00:09

or not will be decided by whether these different<00:00:10.240> groups<00:00:11.200> of<00:00:11.519> people<00:00:12.400> these

00:00:12

different groups of people these

00:00:12

different groups of people these different<00:00:13.599> groups<00:00:13.920> of<00:00:14.160> voters<00:00:14.799> are<00:00:15.040> able<00:00:15.360> to

00:00:15

different groups of voters are able to

00:00:15

different groups of voters are able to do<00:00:16.640> aggressive<00:00:17.199> and<00:00:17.440> relentless<00:00:18.000> pursuit<00:00:18.320> of

00:00:18

do aggressive and relentless pursuit of

00:00:18

do aggressive and relentless pursuit of of<00:00:18.640> unity<00:00:18.880> and<00:00:19.119> common<00:00:19.359> ground.<00:00:19.840> It's<00:00:20.080> as

00:00:20

of unity and common ground. It's as

00:00:20

of unity and common ground. It's as simple<00:00:20.480> as<00:00:20.640> that.<00:00:20.960> Basically<00:00:21.760> um<00:00:22.160> we<00:00:22.480> have

00:00:22

simple as that. Basically um we have

00:00:22

simple as that. Basically um we have especially<00:00:23.199> in<00:00:23.439> this<00:00:23.600> country<00:00:23.840> a<00:00:24.080> political

00:00:24

especially in this country a political

00:00:24

especially in this country a political system<00:00:25.519> which<00:00:26.240> aggressively<00:00:27.199> punishes

00:00:27

system which aggressively punishes

00:00:27

system which aggressively punishes division<00:00:28.560> aggressively<00:00:29.359> aggressively

00:00:29

division aggressively aggressively

00:00:30

division aggressively aggressively punishes<00:00:30.480> division.<00:00:31.199> What<00:00:31.439> will<00:00:31.760> probably

00:00:32

punishes division. What will probably

00:00:32

punishes division. What will probably happen<00:00:33.440> in<00:00:33.680> the<00:00:33.840> next<00:00:34.079> election<00:00:35.280> is<00:00:35.600> that

00:00:35

happen in the next election is that

00:00:35

happen in the next election is that reform<00:00:36.399> will<00:00:36.719> win<00:00:37.280> an<00:00:37.520> overall<00:00:37.840> majority<00:00:38.640> and

00:00:38

reform will win an overall majority and

00:00:38

reform will win an overall majority and that<00:00:39.200> will<00:00:39.360> be<00:00:39.600> simply<00:00:40.000> because<00:00:41.120> the<00:00:41.360> the

00:00:41

that will be simply because the the

00:00:41

that will be simply because the the people<00:00:42.239> and<00:00:42.480> the<00:00:42.640> the<00:00:42.960> politicians<00:00:43.520> in<00:00:43.760> this

00:00:43

people and the the politicians in this

00:00:44

people and the the politicians in this country<00:00:44.239> who<00:00:44.559> do<00:00:44.719> not<00:00:44.879> support<00:00:45.120> reform<00:00:46.160> are

00:00:46

country who do not support reform are

00:00:46

country who do not support reform are divided.<00:00:47.360> So<00:00:47.600> whether<00:00:48.000> reform<00:00:49.039> win<00:00:49.280> or<00:00:49.520> not<00:00:49.840> is

00:00:50

divided. So whether reform win or not is

00:00:50

divided. So whether reform win or not is basically<00:00:50.559> a<00:00:50.879> question<00:00:51.120> of<00:00:52.079> will<00:00:52.399> the<00:00:52.640> center

00:00:53

basically a question of will the center

00:00:53

basically a question of will the center and<00:00:53.600> will<00:00:53.840> the<00:00:54.000> left<00:00:54.879> be<00:00:55.120> able<00:00:56.160> to<00:00:56.960> be

00:00:57

and will the left be able to be

00:00:57

and will the left be able to be aggressive<00:00:57.680> and<00:00:57.920> relentless<00:00:58.320> in<00:00:58.480> their

00:00:58

aggressive and relentless in their

00:00:58

aggressive and relentless in their pursuit<00:00:58.800> of<00:00:58.960> common<00:00:59.280> ground.<00:00:59.760> And<00:01:00.160> um<00:01:01.520> I<00:01:01.760> would

00:01:01

pursuit of common ground. And um I would

00:01:02

pursuit of common ground. And um I would love<00:01:02.480> for<00:01:02.800> them<00:01:03.039> to<00:01:04.239> unite<00:01:04.799> on<00:01:05.040> the<00:01:05.280> issues

00:01:05

love for them to unite on the issues

00:01:05

love for them to unite on the issues which<00:01:05.840> they<00:01:06.000> have<00:01:06.159> in<00:01:06.320> common<00:01:06.880> which<00:01:07.119> I<00:01:07.280> would

00:01:07

which they have in common which I would

00:01:07

which they have in common which I would like<00:01:07.680> to<00:01:07.840> believe<00:01:08.159> are<00:01:08.479> fixing<00:01:08.799> the<00:01:09.040> economy,

00:01:10

like to believe are fixing the economy,

00:01:10

like to believe are fixing the economy, dealing<00:01:10.720> with<00:01:10.880> inequality,<00:01:11.920> dealing<00:01:12.159> with<00:01:12.240> an

00:01:12

dealing with inequality, dealing with an

00:01:12

dealing with inequality, dealing with an unfair<00:01:12.720> taxation<00:01:13.200> system.<00:01:14.479> If<00:01:14.799> they<00:01:15.040> are<00:01:15.280> able

00:01:15

unfair taxation system. If they are able

00:01:15

unfair taxation system. If they are able to<00:01:15.920> be<00:01:16.080> sensible,<00:01:16.720> get<00:01:16.960> their<00:01:17.119> heads

00:01:17

to be sensible, get their heads

00:01:17

to be sensible, get their heads together,<00:01:18.320> focus<00:01:18.640> on<00:01:18.799> the<00:01:18.960> message<00:01:19.119> that<00:01:19.360> will

00:01:19

together, focus on the message that will

00:01:19

together, focus on the message that will win,<00:01:19.920> which<00:01:20.240> is<00:01:20.479> inequality,<00:01:21.520> distribution,

00:01:22

win, which is inequality, distribution,

00:01:22

win, which is inequality, distribution, the<00:01:22.640> economy,<00:01:23.600> focus<00:01:24.000> aggressively<00:01:24.560> on<00:01:24.720> their

00:01:24

the economy, focus aggressively on their

00:01:24

the economy, focus aggressively on their common<00:01:25.200> ground,<00:01:26.080> try<00:01:26.400> to<00:01:26.640> avoid<00:01:27.280> bickering

00:01:27

common ground, try to avoid bickering

00:01:27

common ground, try to avoid bickering and<00:01:27.920> raising<00:01:28.320> the<00:01:28.400> salience<00:01:29.040> of<00:01:29.280> their

00:01:29

and raising the salience of their

00:01:29

and raising the salience of their differences,<00:01:30.640> try<00:01:31.040> to<00:01:31.200> avoid<00:01:31.520> raising<00:01:31.920> the

00:01:31

differences, try to avoid raising the

00:01:32

differences, try to avoid raising the salience<00:01:32.400> of<00:01:32.640> their<00:01:32.880> opponents,<00:01:33.840> then<00:01:34.079> they

00:01:34

salience of their opponents, then they

00:01:34

salience of their opponents, then they could<00:01:34.479> win.<00:01:34.799> If<00:01:34.960> they're<00:01:35.200> divided,<00:01:35.680> they<00:01:35.920> will

00:01:36

could win. If they're divided, they will

00:01:36

could win. If they're divided, they will lose.