if you look at the funding and you
compare<00:00:25.320> it<00:00:25.439> to<00:00:25.560> the<00:00:25.680> number<00:00:25.859> of<00:00:26.039> people<00:00:26.220> that
compare it to the number of people that
live<00:00:26.640> in<00:00:26.760> each<00:00:26.939> region<00:00:27.300> the<00:00:27.779> region<00:00:28.019> that<00:00:28.199> has
live in each region the region that has
done<00:00:28.500> the<00:00:28.740> best<00:00:29.039> in<00:00:29.279> the<00:00:29.460> amount<00:00:29.640> of<00:00:29.760> funding
done the best in the amount of funding
per<00:00:30.359> person<00:00:30.599> is<00:00:31.140> the<00:00:31.320> north<00:00:31.500> it's<00:00:31.859> a<00:00:32.099> one-off
millions back to the treasury should
more<00:00:44.340> millionaires<00:00:45.000> be<00:00:45.180> made<00:00:45.300> to<00:00:45.540> do<00:00:45.719> the<00:00:45.960> same
this former city Trader thinks they
should<00:00:48.420> for<00:00:48.719> the<00:00:48.899> good<00:00:49.020> of<00:00:49.260> the<00:00:49.440> economy
should for the good of the economy
and<00:00:50.879> would<00:00:51.120> you<00:00:51.239> rather<00:00:51.420> eat<00:00:51.719> a<00:00:51.899> burger<00:00:52.020> made
brought by a former Deutsche Bank worker
who<00:01:10.920> was<00:01:11.100> nicknamed<00:01:11.880> for<00:01:12.360> her<00:01:12.600> gray<00:01:12.780> hair
the president of the European Central
Bank<00:01:17.460> you<00:01:17.820> can<00:01:17.939> see<00:01:18.180> her<00:01:18.600> here<00:01:18.900> rather<00:01:19.619> than
Bank you can see her here rather than
the<00:01:20.280> former<00:01:20.640> Banker<00:01:21.060> from<00:01:21.240> Deutsche<00:01:21.659> Bank<00:01:21.780> who
wasn't the entire case that she
presented<00:01:27.960> but<00:01:28.259> the<00:01:28.500> judge<00:01:28.799> ruled<00:01:29.100> that<00:01:29.580> the
presented but the judge ruled that the
nickname<00:01:30.240> or<00:01:30.659> jokes<00:01:31.080> about<00:01:31.380> gray<00:01:31.920> hair<00:01:32.280> was
is this the sort of comment that would
have<00:01:44.340> been<00:01:44.520> made<00:01:44.759> in<00:01:45.060> some<00:01:45.180> of<00:01:45.299> the<00:01:45.420> places
have been made in some of the places
where<00:01:46.380> you<00:01:46.560> worked<00:01:46.920> as<00:01:47.280> a<00:01:47.700> city<00:01:47.939> Trader<00:01:48.720> and<00:01:49.380> do
where you worked as a city Trader and do
you<00:01:49.619> think<00:01:49.740> this<00:01:49.860> woman<00:01:50.040> had<00:01:50.340> a<00:01:50.520> case<00:01:50.700> uh
there was definitely a lot of joking
like<00:01:56.880> this<00:01:57.000> when<00:01:57.180> I<00:01:57.240> was<00:01:57.360> on<00:01:57.420> the<00:01:57.540> trading
like this when I was on the trading
floor<00:01:58.380> um<00:01:58.500> I<00:01:58.740> was<00:01:58.799> in<00:01:58.920> my<00:01:59.040> early<00:01:59.220> 20s<00:01:59.579> so<00:01:59.820> I
floor um I was in my early 20s so I
definitely<00:02:00.299> wasn't<00:02:00.420> in<00:02:00.659> my<00:02:00.780> gray<00:02:00.899> era<00:02:01.259> at<00:02:01.320> that
um I got teased quite a lot well I got
teased<00:02:04.380> for<00:02:04.500> it<00:02:04.619> is<00:02:04.740> the<00:02:04.860> way<00:02:04.979> that<00:02:05.100> I<00:02:05.219> took<00:02:05.460> you
teased for it is the way that I took you
know<00:02:06.240> I'm<00:02:06.659> from<00:02:06.840> pretty<00:02:07.020> poor<00:02:07.320> buck<00:02:07.439> and<00:02:07.619> I'm
know I'm from pretty poor buck and I'm
from<00:02:07.860> east<00:02:07.979> London<00:02:08.280> there's<00:02:08.520> not<00:02:08.700> many<00:02:08.819> people
from east London there's not many people
from<00:02:09.300> my<00:02:09.479> sort<00:02:09.660> of<00:02:09.780> background<00:02:09.959> on<00:02:10.200> the
from my sort of background on the
trading<00:02:10.560> floor<00:02:10.679> nowadays<00:02:11.220> but<00:02:11.640> for<00:02:11.819> me<00:02:12.000> what
trading floor nowadays but for me what
was<00:02:12.780> important<00:02:13.200> was<00:02:13.440> even<00:02:14.160> though<00:02:14.280> I<00:02:14.459> came
was important was even though I came
from<00:02:14.700> that<00:02:14.819> background<00:02:15.120> and<00:02:15.239> I<00:02:15.420> talked<00:02:15.540> how<00:02:15.720> I
from that background and I talked how I
do<00:02:16.020> they<00:02:16.680> gave<00:02:16.920> me<00:02:17.040> a<00:02:17.220> chance<00:02:17.340> to<00:02:17.520> trade
do they gave me a chance to trade
against<00:02:17.940> everybody<00:02:18.239> else<00:02:18.660> and<00:02:19.080> when<00:02:19.319> they<00:02:19.440> saw
against everybody else and when they saw
that<00:02:19.800> I<00:02:20.099> was<00:02:20.220> a<00:02:20.280> better<00:02:20.400> Trader<00:02:20.760> than
that I was a better Trader than
everybody<00:02:20.940> else<00:02:21.300> I<00:02:21.720> was<00:02:21.840> the<00:02:22.020> guy<00:02:22.200> and<00:02:22.860> I<00:02:22.980> think
everybody else I was the guy and I think
I've<00:02:23.580> actually<00:02:23.819> seen<00:02:24.180> bigger<00:02:25.140> problems<00:02:25.500> after
people that speak like me are very
rarely<00:02:31.200> used<00:02:31.379> to<00:02:31.560> talk<00:02:31.620> about<00:02:31.739> economics<00:02:32.280> so
rarely used to talk about economics so
for<00:02:33.599> me<00:02:33.780> even<00:02:34.379> though<00:02:34.560> in<00:02:34.739> the<00:02:34.860> city<00:02:34.980> I<00:02:35.220> was
for me even though in the city I was
teased<00:02:35.819> I<00:02:36.599> was<00:02:36.720> listened<00:02:37.140> to<00:02:37.200> whereas<00:02:38.520> you
teased I was listened to whereas you
know<00:02:39.000> I<00:02:39.060> often<00:02:39.360> question<00:02:39.480> the<00:02:39.720> media<00:02:40.080> why
know I often question the media why
there<00:02:40.379> are<00:02:40.500> so<00:02:40.560> few<00:02:40.739> people<00:02:40.920> with<00:02:41.099> regional
talking about economics I don't get
teased<00:02:44.879> here<00:02:45.000> but<00:02:45.420> where<00:02:45.660> are<00:02:45.840> the<00:02:45.959> voices<00:02:46.140> and
teased here but where are the voices and
what<00:02:46.560> about<00:02:46.739> older<00:02:47.160> people<00:02:47.280> as<00:02:47.459> you<00:02:47.640> say<00:02:47.760> you
what about older people as you say you
were<00:02:48.000> in<00:02:48.120> your<00:02:48.239> 20s<00:02:48.599> it<00:02:48.900> was<00:02:49.019> your<00:02:49.260> accent
were in your 20s it was your accent
um<00:02:50.459> you<00:02:50.700> say<00:02:50.879> that<00:02:51.120> perhaps<00:02:51.420> there<00:02:51.599> weren't
um you say that perhaps there weren't
many<00:02:52.080> people<00:02:52.260> speaking<00:02:52.860> like<00:02:53.040> you<00:02:53.340> who<00:02:53.700> are
economists do you think attitudes to
older<00:02:56.459> people<00:02:56.640> in<00:02:57.239> the<00:02:57.360> workplace<00:02:57.780> in<00:02:58.260> those
sorts of workplaces is a problem
you<00:03:01.980> know<00:03:02.099> a<00:03:02.220> lot<00:03:02.340> of<00:03:02.400> people<00:03:02.459> don't<00:03:02.640> survive
you know a lot of people don't survive
into<00:03:03.180> therefore<00:03:03.840> no<00:03:04.200> not<00:03:04.379> as<00:03:04.560> traders<00:03:04.980> in
I mean it's a to be honest it's a it's a
doggy<00:03:09.239> dog<00:03:09.360> world<00:03:09.540> for<00:03:09.720> everyone<00:03:09.840> in<00:03:10.319> that
all right well let's turn our attention
to<00:03:23.519> wealth<00:03:24.060> you<00:03:24.420> heard<00:03:24.599> in<00:03:24.900> the<00:03:25.019> headlines
King Charles multi-millionaire has asked
for<00:03:28.080> a<00:03:28.379> surge<00:03:28.680> in<00:03:28.920> profits<00:03:29.400> from<00:03:29.580> the<00:03:29.700> crown
for a surge in profits from the crown
estate<00:03:30.360> in<00:03:30.720> offshore<00:03:31.140> wind<00:03:31.319> farms<00:03:31.800> to<00:03:32.340> be<00:03:32.459> used
estate in offshore wind farms to be used
for<00:03:32.819> what<00:03:33.000> he<00:03:33.180> called<00:03:33.360> The<00:03:33.720> Wider<00:03:34.140> public<00:03:34.680> good
for what he called The Wider public good
so<00:03:35.819> it<00:03:36.060> would<00:03:36.239> mean<00:03:36.480> that<00:03:37.200> some<00:03:37.379> money<00:03:37.560> set
so it would mean that some money set
aside<00:03:38.280> for<00:03:38.879> The<00:03:39.060> Sovereign<00:03:39.420> Grant<00:03:39.780> you<00:03:39.959> can
aside for The Sovereign Grant you can
see<00:03:40.200> here<00:03:40.319> the<00:03:40.500> headline<00:03:40.799> in<00:03:41.040> the<00:03:41.159> times
generate a billion pounds for Britain it
would<00:03:45.900> be<00:03:46.019> set<00:03:46.200> aside<00:03:46.560> normally<00:03:47.099> for<00:03:47.280> The
suggesting it be retained by the
treasury<00:03:53.280> and<00:03:53.940> can<00:03:54.239> be<00:03:54.420> used<00:03:54.659> for<00:03:55.140> public
treasury and can be used for public
spending<00:03:55.980> so<00:03:56.340> should<00:03:56.760> the<00:03:57.120> rest<00:03:57.239> of<00:03:57.900> the<00:03:58.080> rich
spending so should the rest of the rich
be<00:03:58.560> doing<00:03:58.799> something<00:03:59.220> similar<00:03:59.940> what<00:04:00.180> do<00:04:00.299> you
make of the king's decision announcement
today<00:04:02.519> a<00:04:03.060> good<00:04:03.299> oh<00:04:03.840> it's<00:04:04.019> very<00:04:04.260> generous<00:04:04.560> of
today a good oh it's very generous of
him<00:04:04.860> I<00:04:05.040> wish<00:04:05.400> I<00:04:05.459> had<00:04:05.580> a<00:04:05.700> billion<00:04:05.879> pounds<00:04:06.180> I
him I wish I had a billion pounds I
could<00:04:06.420> donate<00:04:06.780> away<00:04:06.959> and<00:04:07.260> be<00:04:07.500> able<00:04:07.680> to<00:04:07.739> afford
could donate away and be able to afford
um<00:04:08.580> but<00:04:08.819> it's<00:04:08.940> not<00:04:09.060> enough<00:04:09.180> it's<00:04:09.659> not<00:04:09.840> enough
um but it's not enough it's not enough
in<00:04:10.620> the<00:04:10.739> last<00:04:10.799> three<00:04:11.040> years<00:04:11.159> the<00:04:11.459> government's
that would be enough to give 14 000
pounds<00:04:16.919> to<00:04:17.220> every<00:04:17.519> single<00:04:17.820> adult<00:04:17.940> in<00:04:18.239> the
now if you're going to give up that
amount<00:04:20.699> of<00:04:20.820> money<00:04:21.000> you<00:04:21.540> need<00:04:21.720> to<00:04:21.900> do<00:04:22.019> an
amount of money you need to do an
analysis<00:04:22.680> of<00:04:23.040> where<00:04:23.220> that<00:04:23.340> money<00:04:23.460> is<00:04:23.580> going<00:04:23.699> to
analysis of where that money is going to
end<00:04:23.820> up<00:04:24.000> you<00:04:24.540> have<00:04:24.660> to<00:04:24.900> and<00:04:25.440> at<00:04:25.560> the<00:04:25.620> beginning
end up you have to and at the beginning
of<00:04:25.919> covert<00:04:26.340> I<00:04:26.460> was<00:04:26.520> screaming<00:04:26.820> out<00:04:26.940> let's<00:04:27.120> do
of covert I was screaming out let's do
an<00:04:27.419> analysis<00:04:27.780> of<00:04:27.840> who's<00:04:27.960> going<00:04:28.139> to<00:04:28.199> end<00:04:28.320> up
do it the BBC didn't do it so I did it
and<00:04:34.860> what<00:04:34.979> I<00:04:35.160> found<00:04:35.220> out<00:04:35.400> was<00:04:35.520> that<00:04:35.699> money<00:04:35.880> was
and what I found out was that money was
going<00:04:36.240> to<00:04:36.300> overwhelmingly<00:04:36.900> end<00:04:37.080> up<00:04:37.199> with<00:04:37.320> the
richest people in society that's enough
money<00:04:39.419> to<00:04:39.660> give<00:04:39.720> the<00:04:39.900> richest<00:04:40.259> 5<00:04:40.560> million
money to give the richest 5 million
adults<00:04:41.160> in<00:04:41.280> this<00:04:41.460> country<00:04:41.580> a<00:04:42.240> hundred<00:04:42.660> and
adults in this country a hundred and
forty<00:04:43.020> thousand<00:04:43.320> pounds<00:04:43.560> each<00:04:43.740> now<00:04:44.220> you<00:04:44.520> were
pounds in your first two years
um<00:04:49.440> you<00:04:49.740> say<00:04:49.919> as<00:04:50.400> a<00:04:50.759> Trader<00:04:51.240> you've<00:04:51.900> changed
um you say as a Trader you've changed
your<00:04:52.620> mind<00:04:52.979> about<00:04:53.759> how<00:04:54.360> uh<00:04:54.900> the<00:04:55.080> world<00:04:55.139> how
your mind about how uh the world how
capitalism<00:04:56.160> uh<00:04:56.880> should<00:04:57.120> work<00:04:57.360> in<00:04:57.780> the<00:04:57.900> UK<00:04:58.259> what
capitalism uh should work in the UK what
what<00:04:58.860> what<00:04:58.919> sort<00:04:59.400> of<00:04:59.460> triggered<00:04:59.820> your<00:04:59.940> damocin
millionaire is after the 2008 crisis
I<00:05:06.180> realized<00:05:06.540> that<00:05:06.780> because<00:05:07.080> of<00:05:07.259> a<00:05:07.440> massive
we would basically never come out of
that<00:05:10.680> crisis<00:05:10.979> and<00:05:11.460> I<00:05:11.580> started<00:05:11.880> to<00:05:11.940> put<00:05:12.120> massive
that crisis and I started to put massive
bets<00:05:12.780> on<00:05:12.840> that<00:05:13.020> the<00:05:13.199> economy<00:05:13.440> would<00:05:13.500> get<00:05:13.680> worse
bets on that the economy would get worse
and<00:05:13.979> worse<00:05:14.280> and<00:05:14.340> worse<00:05:14.639> and<00:05:15.240> within<00:05:15.600> a<00:05:15.780> year<00:05:15.900> of
doing that I became citibank's most
profitable<00:05:17.880> Trader<00:05:18.240> in<00:05:18.360> the<00:05:18.479> world<00:05:18.540> so<00:05:19.259> you
profitable Trader in the world so you
know<00:05:19.979> if<00:05:20.040> your<00:05:20.220> job<00:05:20.460> is<00:05:20.580> to<00:05:20.759> look<00:05:20.880> at<00:05:21.000> the
know if your job is to look at the
economy<00:05:21.540> and<00:05:21.900> analyze<00:05:22.440> it<00:05:22.560> and<00:05:23.039> your<00:05:23.280> analysis
economy and analyze it and your analysis
is<00:05:23.880> the<00:05:24.000> economy<00:05:24.300> is<00:05:24.360> going<00:05:24.479> to<00:05:24.600> get<00:05:24.660> worse<00:05:24.840> and
worse because of inequality and they
knew<00:05:26.699> what<00:05:26.759> it<00:05:26.880> does<00:05:26.940> to<00:05:27.120> be<00:05:27.180> the<00:05:27.300> best<00:05:27.360> Trader
knew what it does to be the best Trader
in<00:05:27.840> the<00:05:27.960> world<00:05:28.080> I<00:05:28.800> think<00:05:28.979> it<00:05:29.220> you<00:05:29.759> have<00:05:29.820> a
responsibility to do something about it
Civics<00:05:31.500> would<00:05:31.740> say<00:05:31.860> that's<00:05:32.039> after<00:05:32.220> you<00:05:32.520> earned
Civics would say that's after you earned
all<00:05:33.000> that<00:05:33.180> money<00:05:33.360> uh<00:05:33.900> that<00:05:34.080> that<00:05:34.259> was<00:05:34.740> 25<00:05:34.919> you
all that money uh that that was 25 you
know<00:05:35.580> you<00:05:35.699> could<00:05:35.820> give<00:05:35.940> me<00:05:36.060> a<00:05:36.180> bit<00:05:36.240> of<00:05:36.360> time
this is let's not forget money that has
been<00:05:43.020> taxed<00:05:43.500> on<00:05:43.620> acquisition<00:05:44.220> that<00:05:44.699> you<00:05:44.880> are
been taxed on acquisition that you are
then<00:05:45.180> looking<00:05:45.360> at<00:05:45.600> taxing<00:05:45.960> further<00:05:46.320> well<00:05:46.620> what
then looking at taxing further well what
are<00:05:46.919> the<00:05:47.039> policies<00:05:47.280> going<00:05:47.460> what<00:05:47.699> would<00:05:47.759> you<00:05:47.880> do
are the policies going what would you do
lots<00:05:48.539> of<00:05:48.600> things<00:05:48.720> are<00:05:48.900> difficult<00:05:49.199> but<00:05:49.320> some
lots of things are difficult but some
things<00:05:49.620> are<00:05:49.800> important<00:05:50.100> okay<00:05:50.400> if<00:05:50.820> you<00:05:50.880> give
things are important okay if you give
out<00:05:51.240> 700<00:05:51.780> billion<00:05:52.139> pounds<00:05:52.500> you<00:05:52.800> need<00:05:52.979> to<00:05:53.100> know
out 700 billion pounds you need to know
where<00:05:53.400> that<00:05:53.580> money's<00:05:53.880> gone<00:05:54.000> to<00:05:54.180> okay<00:05:54.419> if
you're giving hundreds of thousands of
pounds<00:05:56.340> to<00:05:56.759> the<00:05:57.000> richest<00:05:57.240> people<00:05:57.360> in<00:05:57.539> the
country you have to expect inflation
a<00:06:02.100> cost<00:06:02.220> of<00:06:02.400> living<00:06:02.460> Christ<00:06:02.699> for<00:06:02.880> ordinary
people listen we increased inequality at
the<00:06:05.400> fastest<00:06:05.820> rate<00:06:06.060> in<00:06:06.360> the<00:06:06.479> history<00:06:06.539> of<00:06:06.780> this
the fastest rate in the history of this
country<00:06:07.080> during<00:06:07.860> a<00:06:08.100> time<00:06:08.160> when<00:06:08.340> the<00:06:08.460> economy
was closed you are making ordinary
families<00:06:11.460> poorer<00:06:11.880> that<00:06:12.240> is<00:06:12.360> the<00:06:12.539> cause<00:06:12.660> of
pounds being handed out during the
pandemic<00:06:18.120> in<00:06:18.300> part<00:06:18.479> so<00:06:18.660> during<00:06:18.900> the<00:06:19.020> furlough
scheme the argument from the government
um<00:06:21.660> and<00:06:21.840> I'll<00:06:21.960> let<00:06:22.139> Nikki<00:06:22.500> and<00:06:22.620> Angela<00:06:22.979> uh<00:06:23.220> in
um and I'll let Nikki and Angela uh in
in<00:06:23.520> a<00:06:23.639> moment<00:06:23.759> was<00:06:23.940> that<00:06:24.060> it<00:06:24.180> kept<00:06:24.419> the<00:06:24.539> it<00:06:24.900> kept
what were they to do instead
you<00:06:29.639> do<00:06:29.699> the<00:06:29.819> analysis<00:06:30.180> where<00:06:30.360> the<00:06:30.539> money<00:06:30.600> will
you do the analysis where the money will
end<00:06:30.960> up<00:06:31.020> listen<00:06:31.259> I<00:06:31.860> was<00:06:31.979> there<00:06:32.100> I'm<00:06:32.340> an
where does it end up okay the money goes
to<00:06:35.460> follow<00:06:35.580> the<00:06:35.880> workers<00:06:36.120> it's<00:06:36.300> 14<00:06:36.900> 000<00:06:37.020> pounds
per adult do you think furloughed
workers<00:06:39.000> are<00:06:39.120> 14<00:06:39.539> 000<00:06:39.600> pounds<00:06:39.840> richer<00:06:40.199> they're
not because they weren't getting their
wages<00:06:41.699> okay<00:06:42.240> well<00:06:42.479> who's<00:06:42.600> got<00:06:42.780> the<00:06:42.840> wages<00:06:43.080> the
corporations what were the corporations
Rich<00:06:45.419> up<00:06:45.720> in<00:06:46.440> general<00:06:46.560> not<00:06:46.860> because<00:06:47.039> they<00:06:47.220> were
Rich up in general not because they were
closed<00:06:47.639> who's<00:06:48.060> got<00:06:48.300> the<00:06:48.419> money<00:06:48.539> the<00:06:49.020> customers
closed who's got the money the customers
but<00:06:49.979> not<00:06:50.280> all<00:06:50.400> customers<00:06:50.819> because<00:06:51.060> it<00:06:51.300> was
stopped during coven Nikki do you want
to<00:06:55.380> uh<00:06:55.740> defend<00:06:56.160> furlough<00:06:56.699> and<00:06:56.880> the<00:06:57.000> decisions
to uh defend furlough and the decisions
made<00:06:57.660> by<00:06:58.020> the<00:06:58.199> government<00:06:58.380> during<00:06:58.740> that<00:06:58.979> time
made by the government during that time
of<00:06:59.520> course<00:06:59.639> there<00:07:00.300> are<00:07:00.360> lots<00:07:00.600> of<00:07:00.660> allegations
about billions being wasted I'm not
against<00:07:03.300> furlough<00:07:03.840> what<00:07:04.199> I'm<00:07:04.380> against<00:07:04.500> is<00:07:04.860> not
against furlough what I'm against is not
analyzing<00:07:05.639> where<00:07:05.759> the<00:07:05.880> money<00:07:06.000> ended<00:07:06.300> up<00:07:06.419> and
not doing anything about it accumulating
with<00:07:08.400> the<00:07:08.520> richest<00:07:08.699> people<00:07:08.819> well<00:07:09.180> they<00:07:09.360> would
with the richest people well they would
say<00:07:09.600> there<00:07:09.660> wasn't<00:07:09.840> enough<00:07:10.080> time<00:07:10.319> to<00:07:10.440> do<00:07:10.560> it
there is an increase in the more the
wealthy<00:07:15.180> paying<00:07:15.660> more<00:07:15.960> taxes<00:07:16.400> I<00:07:17.400> pay<00:07:17.580> tax<00:07:17.759> I
wealthy paying more taxes I pay tax I
pay<00:07:18.539> yeah<00:07:19.020> exactly<00:07:19.259> where<00:07:19.500> can<00:07:19.680> people<00:07:19.800> pay
tax they've been much much lower rates
of<00:07:23.280> tax<00:07:23.400> right<00:07:23.639> and<00:07:23.759> why<00:07:24.000> is<00:07:24.120> that<00:07:24.300> is<00:07:24.539> that
of tax right and why is that is that
because<00:07:24.840> they<00:07:25.139> can<00:07:25.319> afford<00:07:25.680> to<00:07:26.039> move<00:07:26.400> their
because they can afford to move their
money<00:07:26.819> elsewhere<00:07:27.300> is<00:07:27.720> it<00:07:27.840> because<00:07:27.960> they<00:07:28.199> can
money elsewhere is it because they can
afford<00:07:28.620> to<00:07:28.800> leave<00:07:28.979> the<00:07:29.220> country<00:07:29.460> you<00:07:30.000> know
because we have a prime minister whose
father<00:07:33.060> know<00:07:33.240> is<00:07:33.360> one<00:07:33.479> of<00:07:33.539> the<00:07:33.539> richest<00:07:33.780> men<00:07:33.900> in
father know is one of the richest men in
the<00:07:34.139> world<00:07:34.199> we<00:07:34.500> have<00:07:34.620> a<00:07:34.680> previous<00:07:34.800> prime
the world we have a previous prime
minister<00:07:35.340> who<00:07:35.400> wanted<00:07:35.580> to<00:07:35.759> make<00:07:35.819> millions<00:07:36.060> of
minister who wanted to make millions of
pounds<00:07:36.419> as<00:07:36.539> soon<00:07:36.599> as<00:07:36.720> he<00:07:36.780> left<00:07:36.900> office<00:07:37.080> they've
pounds as soon as he left office they've
come<00:07:37.800> and<00:07:37.919> made<00:07:38.039> 10<00:07:38.220> million<00:07:38.460> pounds<00:07:38.699> in<00:07:38.759> a
come and made 10 million pounds in a
year<00:07:38.940> of<00:07:39.060> leaving<00:07:39.180> office<00:07:39.419> if<00:07:40.080> you<00:07:40.319> put<00:07:40.560> tax
year of leaving office if you put tax
decisions<00:07:41.220> in<00:07:41.880> the<00:07:41.940> hands<00:07:42.300> of<00:07:42.720> people<00:07:42.840> who<00:07:43.139> are
extremely rich or about to become
extremely<00:07:45.060> rich<00:07:45.300> do<00:07:46.020> you<00:07:46.199> think<00:07:46.500> they<00:07:46.919> will
extremely rich do you think they will
say<00:07:47.280> Lex<00:07:47.699> that's<00:07:48.000> extremely<00:07:48.360> rich<00:07:48.539> people<00:07:48.780> all
say Lex that's extremely rich people all
right<00:07:49.199> Nikki<00:07:49.620> I<00:07:50.039> think<00:07:50.160> that's<00:07:50.280> a<00:07:50.460> cheap<00:07:50.880> shot
right Nikki I think that's a cheap shot
keep<00:07:51.419> keep<00:07:51.840> throwing<00:07:52.199> at<00:07:52.319> the<00:07:52.440> Prime<00:07:52.560> Minister
keep keep throwing at the Prime Minister
you<00:07:53.160> know<00:07:53.280> he<00:07:53.580> comes<00:07:53.819> from<00:07:53.880> the<00:07:54.060> background<00:07:54.300> he
you know he comes from the background he
comes<00:07:54.660> from<00:07:54.780> he's<00:07:55.139> worked<00:07:55.440> hard<00:07:55.560> like<00:07:55.919> you<00:07:56.099> in
comes from he's worked hard like you in
the<00:07:56.520> city<00:07:56.699> and<00:07:57.300> you<00:07:57.479> know<00:07:57.599> he's<00:07:57.780> made<00:07:58.440> his
and I want to see tax cuts and you know
and<00:08:13.199> I'm<00:08:13.440> not<00:08:13.800> coming<00:08:13.979> are<00:08:14.220> they<00:08:14.400> well<00:08:14.580> let's
and I'm not coming are they well let's
see<00:08:14.880> what's<00:08:15.000> happened<00:08:15.180> let's<00:08:15.539> look<00:08:15.840> let's<00:08:16.139> see
see what's happened let's look let's see
what<00:08:16.440> happens<00:08:16.560> in<00:08:16.740> the<00:08:16.860> budget<00:08:17.039> let's<00:08:17.160> see
what happens in the budget let's see
what<00:08:17.460> happens<00:08:17.580> in<00:08:17.819> the<00:08:17.940> next<00:08:18.060> budget<00:08:18.419> no<00:08:18.720> we've
what happens in the next budget no we've
got<00:08:19.199> we've<00:08:19.560> we've<00:08:19.919> got<00:08:20.039> we've<00:08:20.400> got<00:08:20.580> to<00:08:20.699> we've
on of course but we've also got to
ensure<00:08:26.940> that<00:08:27.060> we<00:08:27.240> pay<00:08:27.479> for<00:08:27.900> covert<00:08:28.319> we<00:08:28.620> pay<00:08:28.800> for
ensure that we pay for covert we pay for
the<00:08:29.099> cost<00:08:29.220> of<00:08:29.340> living<00:08:29.520> and<00:08:29.819> we<00:08:29.940> ensure<00:08:30.240> that<00:08:30.419> we
the cost of living and we ensure that we
pay<00:08:31.139> for<00:08:31.379> the<00:08:31.560> war<00:08:31.800> that's<00:08:32.039> in<00:08:32.219> Ukraine<00:08:32.640> what
pay for the war that's in Ukraine what
do<00:08:33.000> you<00:08:33.120> say<00:08:33.180> to<00:08:33.360> James<00:08:33.539> Dyson<00:08:34.020> I<00:08:34.260> mean<00:08:34.380> he<00:08:34.500> is<00:08:34.680> a
um and he doesn't want regulation and
high<00:08:38.580> taxes<00:08:39.060> in<00:08:39.360> order<00:08:39.479> to<00:08:39.659> create<00:08:39.899> jobs<00:08:40.200> and
high taxes in order to create jobs and
pay<00:08:40.680> those<00:08:40.919> people<00:08:41.159> well<00:08:41.700> I've<00:08:41.880> never<00:08:42.060> met
pay those people well I've never met
James<00:08:42.419> Dyson<00:08:42.719> he<00:08:42.899> might<00:08:43.020> be<00:08:43.140> a<00:08:43.200> very<00:08:43.320> nice<00:08:43.440> he's
James Dyson he might be a very nice he's
a<00:08:44.339> very<00:08:44.459> wealthy<00:08:44.820> person<00:08:45.000> and<00:08:45.240> he<00:08:45.420> doesn't
a very wealthy person and he doesn't
want<00:08:45.899> tax<00:08:46.020> on<00:08:46.200> the<00:08:46.380> very<00:08:46.440> wealthy<00:08:46.800> I<00:08:47.040> don't
want tax on the very wealthy I don't
think<00:08:47.279> I<00:08:47.459> need<00:08:47.580> to<00:08:47.640> say<00:08:47.760> more<00:08:47.880> than<00:08:48.060> that<00:08:48.240> but
think I need to say more than that but
what<00:08:48.720> I'm<00:08:48.899> saying<00:08:49.080> is<00:08:49.200> what<00:08:49.380> I'm<00:08:49.440> seeing<00:08:49.680> from
this discussion is a government that's
giving<00:08:51.480> out<00:08:51.660> 700<00:08:52.080> billion<00:08:52.380> pounds<00:08:52.620> and<00:08:52.740> has
giving out 700 billion pounds and has
done<00:08:53.160> no<00:08:53.399> analysis<00:08:53.820> well<00:08:54.420> you've<00:08:54.600> said<00:08:54.720> that
done no analysis well you've said that
but<00:08:55.019> you<00:08:55.800> don't<00:08:55.920> even<00:08:56.040> know<00:08:56.160> who's<00:08:56.279> got<00:08:56.519> the
but you don't even know who's got the
money<00:08:56.760> now<00:08:56.940> but<00:08:57.180> you<00:08:57.420> left<00:08:57.540> your<00:08:58.019> job<00:08:58.200> in<00:08:58.440> the
city trading in 2014. more broadly
speaking<00:09:00.959> what<00:09:01.140> is<00:09:01.320> the<00:09:01.440> answer<00:09:01.560> what<00:09:01.860> are<00:09:01.980> the
conservatives could do that would
actually<00:09:05.760> bring<00:09:06.360> back<00:09:06.660> some<00:09:06.899> of<00:09:07.019> the<00:09:07.140> way
actually bring back some of the way
wealth<00:09:07.980> from<00:09:08.279> the<00:09:08.640> super<00:09:08.820> rich<00:09:09.120> if<00:09:09.959> we're
wealth from the super rich if we're
going<00:09:10.260> to<00:09:10.380> call<00:09:10.560> them<00:09:10.740> that<00:09:10.920> and<00:09:11.279> redistribute
should equate capital gains with income
tax<00:09:16.920> there's<00:09:17.160> no<00:09:17.339> reason<00:09:17.459> why<00:09:17.700> the<00:09:17.820> wealthy
close the loopholes obviously but you
need<00:09:22.380> to<00:09:22.500> bring<00:09:22.620> in<00:09:22.800> something<00:09:23.040> that<00:09:23.339> will
need to bring in something that will
transfer<00:09:24.000> that<00:09:24.060> wealth<00:09:24.300> back<00:09:24.480> if<00:09:24.720> you<00:09:24.899> do<00:09:25.019> not
transfer that wealth back if you do not
if<00:09:25.320> you're<00:09:25.440> willing<00:09:25.740> to<00:09:25.800> give<00:09:25.920> 700<00:09:26.279> billion
if you're willing to give 700 billion
pounds<00:09:26.760> to<00:09:26.820> riches<00:09:27.180> and<00:09:27.360> do<00:09:27.480> nothing<00:09:27.600> to<00:09:27.839> bring
pounds to riches and do nothing to bring
it<00:09:28.080> back<00:09:28.260> then<00:09:28.980> ordinary<00:09:29.459> families<00:09:29.760> pay<00:09:29.940> the
it back then ordinary families pay the
price<00:09:30.240> so<00:09:30.720> you<00:09:30.839> need<00:09:30.959> to<00:09:31.080> bring<00:09:31.260> in<00:09:31.440> serious
price so you need to bring in serious
moves<00:09:32.100> to<00:09:32.220> read<00:09:32.519> this<00:09:32.700> you've<00:09:33.060> got<00:09:33.120> to<00:09:33.300> deal
moves to read this you've got to deal
with<00:09:33.600> offshore<00:09:34.200> tax<00:09:34.740> evasions<00:09:35.279> you've<00:09:35.580> got<00:09:35.700> to
in global multinational corporations
some<00:09:46.980> of<00:09:47.100> this<00:09:47.220> has<00:09:47.399> got<00:09:47.580> to<00:09:47.760> be<00:09:47.940> done<00:09:48.120> by
as Thomas picketty The Economist says
we're<00:09:54.300> now<00:09:54.480> in<00:09:54.660> a<00:09:54.779> situation<00:09:55.080> where<00:09:55.500> the
we're now in a situation where the
wealthy<00:09:56.220> are<00:09:56.640> going<00:09:56.760> to<00:09:56.880> get<00:09:57.060> more<00:09:57.300> and<00:09:57.480> more
wealthy are going to get more and more
wealthy<00:09:58.140> and<00:09:58.740> wealth<00:09:59.399> is<00:09:59.519> actually<00:09:59.700> going<00:10:00.000> to
growth levels are lower than the amount
of<00:10:04.920> money<00:10:05.100> you<00:10:05.459> can<00:10:05.519> get<00:10:06.000> on<00:10:06.240> on<00:10:06.480> on
the Bloomberg billionaires index has to
be<00:10:14.700> updated<00:10:15.120> every<00:10:15.540> day<00:10:15.779> well<00:10:16.140> I<00:10:16.320> mean
billionaires wealth is rising so much
it's<00:10:19.860> obscene<00:10:20.519> and<00:10:21.240> we<00:10:21.360> need<00:10:21.540> to<00:10:21.720> as<00:10:21.959> an<00:10:22.200> Global
improvements in the quality of life of
the<00:10:43.500> poorest<00:10:43.800> in<00:10:43.920> society<00:10:44.839> this<00:10:45.839> is<00:10:45.899> not<00:10:46.019> about
inequality this is about living
standards<00:10:48.540> of<00:10:48.720> the<00:10:48.899> ordinary<00:10:49.320> people<00:10:49.560> of<00:10:49.740> this
standards of the ordinary people of this
country<00:10:50.040> if<00:10:50.700> you<00:10:50.820> give<00:10:51.060> 700<00:10:51.779> billion<00:10:52.260> pounds
country if you give 700 billion pounds
to<00:10:52.620> the<00:10:52.860> richest<00:10:53.100> people<00:10:53.220> in<00:10:53.399> the<00:10:53.519> country
to the richest people in the country
when<00:10:53.880> the<00:10:54.060> economy<00:10:54.420> is<00:10:54.660> closed<00:10:55.019> they<00:10:55.500> will
when the economy is closed they will
spend<00:10:55.980> that<00:10:56.160> money<00:10:56.339> drive<00:10:56.940> up<00:10:57.180> prices<00:10:57.420> and
be able to afford the basics like food
and<00:11:01.980> energy<00:11:02.160> listen<00:11:02.579> if<00:11:03.060> you<00:11:03.180> give<00:11:03.360> this<00:11:03.540> money
and energy listen if you give this money
to<00:11:03.959> the<00:11:04.079> rich<00:11:04.260> it<00:11:04.980> affects<00:11:05.339> Ordinary<00:11:06.180> People
so what is your solution
a<00:11:09.420> wealth<00:11:09.720> tax<00:11:09.839> in<00:11:10.140> full<00:11:10.320> spending<00:11:10.680> listen<00:11:10.800> do
a wealth tax in full spending listen do
you<00:11:11.279> not<00:11:11.399> accept<00:11:11.519> that<00:11:11.820> all<00:11:12.120> of<00:11:12.240> the<00:11:12.420> downsides
you not accept that all of the downsides
to<00:11:12.959> wealth<00:11:13.200> taxes<00:11:13.500> the<00:11:13.620> fact<00:11:13.740> that<00:11:13.860> they're
talking to somebody who has made
millions<00:11:18.420> of<00:11:18.540> pounds<00:11:18.839> by<00:11:19.019> betting<00:11:19.320> that<00:11:19.380> the
economy will collapse every single year
okay<00:11:21.180> and<00:11:21.420> I'm<00:11:21.600> betting<00:11:21.899> on<00:11:21.959> that<00:11:22.079> right<00:11:22.380> now
okay and I'm betting on that right now
and<00:11:22.860> I<00:11:23.040> don't<00:11:23.100> want<00:11:23.279> it<00:11:23.399> to<00:11:23.459> happen<00:11:23.640> if<00:11:24.120> you<00:11:24.240> do
inequality poverty will get worse and
worse<00:11:29.700> and<00:11:29.820> worse<00:11:30.000> they're<00:11:30.180> not<00:11:30.300> telling<00:11:30.480> you
worse and worse they're not telling you
now<00:11:30.660> listen<00:11:30.899> all<00:11:31.260> right<00:11:31.380> in<00:11:31.560> a<00:11:31.680> few<00:11:31.740> years<00:11:31.860> time
now listen all right in a few years time
when<00:11:32.220> it<00:11:32.339> happens<00:11:32.459> when<00:11:32.940> things<00:11:33.120> are<00:11:33.300> worse
when it happens when things are worse
remember<00:11:34.019> this<00:11:34.380> day<00:11:34.560> it's<00:11:34.860> not<00:11:35.040> and<00:11:35.279> you<00:11:35.399> can't
remember this day it's not and you can't
say<00:11:35.700> you<00:11:35.820> didn't<00:11:35.940> know<00:11:36.060> about<00:11:36.180> sustainable<00:11:36.720> to
say you didn't know about sustainable to
run<00:11:37.560> a<00:11:37.920> global<00:11:38.220> economy<00:11:38.700> with<00:11:39.120> this<00:11:39.300> level<00:11:39.480> of
sustainable because there aren't enough
consumers<00:11:45.120> with<00:11:45.480> enough<00:11:45.660> money<00:11:46.079> to<00:11:46.560> make<00:11:46.740> the
consumers with enough money to make the
economy<00:11:47.459> work<00:11:48.240> so<00:11:48.779> it's<00:11:49.019> not<00:11:49.200> fair<00:11:49.560> in<00:11:49.860> any<00:11:50.040> way
our children and our grandchildren to
pay<00:12:05.760> that<00:12:06.120> debt<00:12:06.480> and<00:12:07.140> we've<00:12:07.380> now<00:12:07.500> got<00:12:07.680> a<00:12:07.800> cost
of living crisis basically because of
the<00:12:10.200> energy<00:12:10.320> crisis<00:12:10.860> and<00:12:11.279> the<00:12:11.640> government<00:12:11.760> has
particularly the most vulnerable over
the<00:12:16.260> over<00:12:17.040> now<00:12:17.220> over<00:12:17.579> the<00:12:18.000> last<00:12:18.120> few<00:12:18.300> months
the over now over the last few months
and<00:12:18.779> moving<00:12:19.140> forward<00:12:19.260> but<00:12:19.920> I<00:12:20.399> think<00:12:20.579> about
and moving forward but I think about
wealth<00:12:21.120> tax<00:12:21.240> we<00:12:21.660> should<00:12:21.839> not<00:12:22.079> be<00:12:22.380> creating
wealth tax we should not be creating
more<00:12:22.980> tax<00:12:23.220> we<00:12:23.519> should<00:12:23.640> be<00:12:23.760> cutting<00:12:24.060> so<00:12:24.180> all
more tax we should be cutting so all
right<00:12:24.540> well<00:12:24.660> you're<00:12:24.839> very<00:12:25.019> clear<00:12:25.140> on<00:12:25.260> that
right well you're very clear on that
we're<00:12:25.500> going<00:12:25.620> to<00:12:25.740> talk<00:12:25.800> about<00:12:25.920> something<00:12:26.220> else
we're going to talk about something else
which<00:12:26.760> is<00:12:26.940> sort<00:12:27.300> of<00:12:27.420> related<00:12:28.019> leveling<00:12:28.620> up
which is sort of related leveling up
it's<00:12:29.279> the<00:12:29.459> great<00:12:29.640> Mantra<00:12:30.180> of<00:12:30.540> uh<00:12:30.720> Boris
Johnson and continues under Rishi soon
now<00:12:33.779> more<00:12:34.019> than<00:12:34.140> 100<00:12:34.320> schemes<00:12:34.860> it's<00:12:34.980> been
announced today have won Government
funding<00:12:37.620> in<00:12:37.920> the<00:12:38.040> second<00:12:38.160> phase<00:12:38.579> of<00:12:38.820> the
funding in the second phase of the
leveling<00:12:39.240> up<00:12:39.360> fund<00:12:39.779> it's<00:12:39.959> worth<00:12:40.200> about<00:12:40.380> 2.1
billion pounds it's not an insignificant
amount<00:12:43.740> of<00:12:43.860> money<00:12:43.980> let's<00:12:44.160> give<00:12:44.339> you<00:12:44.459> an<00:12:44.579> idea
amount of money let's give you an idea
about<00:12:45.000> how<00:12:45.360> how<00:12:45.720> it's<00:12:45.959> going<00:12:46.139> to<00:12:46.200> be<00:12:46.320> spent
so openly boasted about taking money off
labor<00:12:54.600> held<00:12:54.959> errors<00:12:55.260> and<00:12:55.380> giving<00:12:55.500> them<00:12:55.680> to
labor held errors and giving them to
talk<00:12:55.980> he<00:12:56.220> did<00:12:56.339> in<00:12:56.519> a<00:12:56.579> video<00:12:56.700> he<00:12:56.940> said<00:12:57.060> that
talk he did in a video he said that
there<00:12:57.540> are<00:12:57.660> poorer<00:12:58.019> areas<00:12:58.440> in<00:12:58.800> parts<00:12:58.980> of<00:12:59.220> the
country that are broadly affluent but
even<00:13:01.500> in<00:13:01.800> the<00:13:01.920> Southeast<00:13:02.279> there<00:13:02.820> are<00:13:03.000> poorer
even in the Southeast there are poorer
uh<00:13:03.959> poorer<00:13:04.380> areas<00:13:04.740> that<00:13:04.980> need<00:13:05.100> funding<00:13:05.519> is<00:13:05.700> it
uh poorer areas that need funding is it
a<00:13:05.880> good<00:13:06.000> idea<00:13:06.240> is<00:13:06.420> this<00:13:06.600> going<00:13:06.720> to<00:13:06.839> transform
people's lives in these areas
well<00:13:09.660> I<00:13:09.779> mean<00:13:09.899> if<00:13:10.019> I<00:13:10.200> take<00:13:10.320> 15<00:13:10.680> part<00:13:11.100> of<00:13:11.279> you<00:13:11.399> and
well I mean if I take 15 part of you and
then<00:13:11.639> give<00:13:11.820> you<00:13:11.880> two<00:13:12.000> pound<00:13:12.120> 80<00:13:12.420> is<00:13:12.720> that<00:13:12.839> going
these guys they've found 2.8 billion
pounds<00:13:16.860> to<00:13:17.279> give<00:13:17.399> to<00:13:17.639> local<00:13:17.820> councils<00:13:18.420> in<00:13:18.959> the
last three years they're given 700
billion<00:13:21.120> pounds<00:13:21.420> to<00:13:21.480> the<00:13:21.600> richest<00:13:21.839> now<00:13:22.680> you've
billion pounds to the richest now you've
met<00:13:23.160> 50<00:13:23.339> times<00:13:23.639> as<00:13:23.880> much<00:13:24.000> listen<00:13:24.300> is<00:13:24.959> it
met 50 times as much listen is it
leveling<00:13:25.380> up<00:13:25.500> if<00:13:25.740> I<00:13:25.920> give<00:13:26.040> a<00:13:26.279> poor<00:13:26.519> person<00:13:26.639> two
leveling up if I give a poor person two
pound<00:13:27.000> 80<00:13:27.300> and<00:13:27.839> I<00:13:28.019> give<00:13:28.079> a<00:13:28.200> rich<00:13:28.320> person<00:13:28.500> 250
pound 80 and I give a rich person 250
pounds<00:13:30.000> no<00:13:30.480> sorry<00:13:30.839> 700<00:13:31.740> pounds<00:13:32.040> 250<00:13:32.639> times<00:13:32.940> as
largest and fastest ever increased
inequality<00:13:40.320> in<00:13:40.440> the<00:13:40.560> history<00:13:40.680> of<00:13:40.860> the<00:13:40.980> country
inequality in the history of the country
and<00:13:42.480> the<00:13:42.899> most<00:13:42.959> orwellian<00:13:43.500> thing<00:13:43.680> you've<00:13:43.800> ever
heard they call that leveling up
what<00:13:45.839> do<00:13:46.139> you<00:13:46.260> say<00:13:46.440> I<00:13:47.160> think<00:13:47.279> in<00:13:47.639> this<00:13:47.760> case
but finally local Authority budgets have
been<00:14:02.519> cut<00:14:02.700> I<00:14:02.940> mean<00:14:03.000> Angela<00:14:03.420> is<00:14:03.540> right<00:14:03.779> over<00:14:03.959> the
been cut I mean Angela is right over the
years<00:14:04.260> over<00:14:04.620> the<00:14:04.800> years<00:14:04.920> they<00:14:05.160> they<00:14:05.339> have<00:14:05.519> been
money after being asked to promote this
uh<00:14:10.399> I<00:14:11.399> haven't<00:14:11.519> spoken<00:14:11.820> to<00:14:11.940> anybody<00:14:12.180> about<00:14:12.480> it
uh I haven't spoken to anybody about it
either<00:14:13.079> way<00:14:13.260> right<00:14:13.560> so<00:14:13.740> no<00:14:13.920> one's<00:14:14.040> come<00:14:14.160> to<00:14:14.220> you
either way right so no one's come to you
and<00:14:14.459> complain<00:14:14.760> all<00:14:15.060> right<00:14:15.240> well<00:14:15.360> let's<00:14:15.600> move
economic Affairs to do with lab-grown
meat<00:14:24.300> tell<00:14:24.540> us<00:14:24.660> about<00:14:24.839> it<00:14:25.079> sure<00:14:26.399> um<00:14:26.519> I<00:14:26.820> think
meat tell us about it sure um I think
the<00:14:27.120> first<00:14:27.240> thing<00:14:27.420> to<00:14:27.600> say<00:14:27.720> is<00:14:28.079> that<00:14:28.320> although
the first thing to say is that although
the<00:14:28.740> sales<00:14:28.920> are<00:14:29.220> something<00:14:29.339> in<00:14:29.519> the<00:14:29.579> realm<00:14:29.820> of
the sales are something in the realm of
Science<00:14:30.120> Fiction<00:14:30.420> it<00:14:30.899> is<00:14:31.079> underway<00:14:31.560> but<00:14:31.740> is
Science Fiction it is underway but is
nonetheless<00:14:32.399> very<00:14:32.880> much<00:14:33.000> in<00:14:33.300> the<00:14:33.480> early<00:14:33.600> days
environment and is currently across the
world<00:14:44.699> all<00:14:45.000> right<00:14:45.060> well<00:14:45.180> let<00:14:45.360> me<00:14:45.480> ask<00:14:45.600> our
world all right well let me ask our
other<00:14:46.139> guests<00:14:46.500> what<00:14:46.680> do<00:14:46.800> you<00:14:46.920> think<00:14:47.040> about<00:14:47.459> uh
deregulating uh lab-grown meat would you
eat<00:14:50.399> a<00:14:50.579> lab-grown<00:14:51.240> burger<00:14:51.660> I'll<00:14:52.139> give<00:14:52.320> it<00:14:52.440> a<00:14:52.560> go
eat a lab-grown burger I'll give it a go
I<00:14:52.860> don't<00:14:52.980> mind<00:14:53.240> my<00:14:54.240> main<00:14:54.360> thought<00:14:54.600> is<00:14:54.839> you<00:14:55.620> know
I don't mind my main thought is you know
I<00:14:56.040> think<00:14:56.100> it's<00:14:56.279> very<00:14:56.459> interesting<00:14:56.760> that<00:14:57.000> the
iea The Institute of economic affairs
has<00:15:00.300> a<00:15:00.420> chance<00:15:00.540> to<00:15:00.720> come<00:15:00.899> on<00:15:01.079> a<00:15:01.260> show<00:15:01.440> like<00:15:01.620> this
has a chance to come on a show like this
and<00:15:02.220> talk<00:15:02.399> about<00:15:02.579> a<00:15:03.180> disaster<00:15:03.420> in<00:15:03.660> the<00:15:03.839> economy
which are disaster and instead of
grabbing<00:15:10.680> the<00:15:10.800> ball<00:15:10.920> by<00:15:11.040> the<00:15:11.160> horns<00:15:11.459> and
damaging tens of millions of people's
lives<00:15:14.940> they<00:15:15.540> ask<00:15:15.660> us<00:15:15.839> to<00:15:15.959> talk<00:15:16.079> about
lives they ask us to talk about
lab-grown<00:15:16.680> meat<00:15:16.920> and<00:15:17.100> what<00:15:17.220> do<00:15:17.339> you<00:15:17.399> think
lab-grown meat and what do you think
about<00:15:17.639> him<00:15:17.880> about<00:15:18.480> lab-grown<00:15:18.959> me<00:15:19.079> about<00:15:19.320> the
about him about lab-grown me about the
iea<00:15:19.920> but<00:15:20.399> well<00:15:20.579> you've<00:15:20.760> done<00:15:20.880> the<00:15:21.000> Ia<00:15:21.300> about
iea but well you've done the Ia about
lab<00:15:21.839> grow<00:15:22.019> about<00:15:22.440> you're<00:15:22.800> not<00:15:22.980> a<00:15:23.040> fan<00:15:23.160> of
considered uh properly when we're
looking<00:15:34.260> at<00:15:34.740> things<00:15:34.920> like<00:15:35.220> climate<00:15:35.579> change<00:15:35.699> in
yeah for sure if they work if they work
if<00:15:39.839> they<00:15:40.019> just<00:15:40.139> how<00:15:40.380> will<00:15:40.560> you<00:15:40.620> know<00:15:40.740> if<00:15:40.860> they
if they just how will you know if they
if<00:15:41.160> they<00:15:41.459> work<00:15:41.579> unless<00:15:41.820> you<00:15:42.000> try<00:15:42.120> them<00:15:42.839> well<00:15:43.199> I
if they work unless you try them well I
think<00:15:43.440> you<00:15:43.560> should<00:15:43.740> give<00:15:43.860> them<00:15:43.920> a<00:15:44.100> go<00:15:44.220> but<00:15:44.399> if
think you should give them a go but if
you're<00:15:44.639> just<00:15:44.699> using<00:15:44.940> them<00:15:45.000> to<00:15:45.120> distract<00:15:45.360> me
your own disastrous economic advice then
I<00:15:47.699> think<00:15:47.820> it's<00:15:47.940> probably<00:15:48.120> not<00:15:48.360> a<00:15:48.420> good<00:15:48.480> idea
I think it's probably not a good idea
um<00:15:49.860> that's<00:15:50.100> all<00:15:50.279> for<00:15:50.579> today<00:15:50.699> I'm<00:15:51.360> exhausted
but thank you very much to all of our
guests<00:15:53.940> I<00:15:54.180> will<00:15:54.420> be<00:15:54.660> back<00:15:54.839> tomorrow<00:15:55.019> with
guests I will be back tomorrow with
politics<00:15:55.680> UK<00:15:56.040> at<00:15:56.220> 12<00:15:56.339> 15<00:15:56.519> here<00:15:56.820> on<00:15:57.000> bbc2<00:15:57.480> and<00:15:57.720> on