← Back to all transcripts

Special: Can tariffs make you rich? with Ha-Joon Chang

April 03, 2025
Wealth Inequality Enough is Enough Tax Wealth Not Work Economics of Covid Rich get Richer Poor get Poorer Economics Explained Tax the Rich End Austerity Billionaire Poverty
00:00:00

It's like suddenly

00:00:02

saying, "Okay, I have this

00:00:03

45-year-old son who's

00:00:05

not doing very well.

00:00:06

I'm going to

00:00:07

protect him." Yeah?

00:00:08

Yeah, okay.

00:00:09

We have in the news

00:00:10

today-

00:00:11

today is, what

00:00:12

is it called?

00:00:12

Freedom Day?

00:00:13

Liberation Day

00:00:13

Liberation Day.

00:00:14

Today's the day that...

00:00:15

The cheek of it, yeah.

00:00:16

Yeah, today's the day that

00:00:17

Donald Trump is trying to

00:00:18

impose a lot of tariffs.

00:00:20

So I know you talk a lot

00:00:21

in your work about how

00:00:24

poor countries

00:00:25

become rich.

00:00:26

It's a really

00:00:27

interesting topic

00:00:28

because really, not a lot

00:00:31

of poor countries have

00:00:31

successfully become rich-

00:00:32

in the last 70 years,

00:00:34

and Korea is probably,

00:00:35

like, one of the

00:00:36

outstanding examples

00:00:36

of one that has done.

00:00:38

And correct me if

00:00:39

I'm wrong, but from my

00:00:40

understanding of your

00:00:40

work, you speak a lot

00:00:42

about how actually,

00:00:44

a lot of the countries

00:00:45

which did become rich,

00:00:46

not just Korea, but also

00:00:47

including the United

00:00:48

States in its history and,

00:00:49

and the United Kingdom-

00:00:50

Mm-hmm.

00:00:50

... used things like

00:00:51

tariffs and things

00:00:52

like protectionism.

00:00:53

Yeah.

00:00:53

So I guess I couldn't

00:00:54

really have you on

00:00:55

today- on Trump's Tariff

00:00:57

Day, without asking you

00:00:59

what you think about

00:00:59

tariffs as a concept-

00:01:01

what you think about

00:01:01

Trump's tariff plans.

00:01:03

Mm-hmm.

00:01:03

Where do you

00:01:03

think they... will

00:01:05

they improve living

00:01:06

standards for Americans?

00:01:08

Well, first of all,

00:01:09

tariffs, like all

00:01:10

other policy tools,

00:01:12

can be used for good, used

00:01:14

for bad purposes.

00:01:15

Yeah.

00:01:16

So that, you know, there

00:01:18

is no tool that is,

00:01:20

universally good

00:01:21

or universally bad.

00:01:22

Yeah.

00:01:22

So that it all depends

00:01:24

on why you are using it,

00:01:26

how you are using it, yeah?

00:01:28

So that the most

00:01:29

successful use of a

00:01:30

tariff is based on

00:01:32

this idea of infant

00:01:35

industry protection.

00:01:36

Yeah.

00:01:37

So that ideas

00:01:38

are basically that

00:01:38

the governments

00:01:40

of economically

00:01:41

backward nations

00:01:43

need to protect and

00:01:45

nurture their industries,

00:01:46

through tariffs, but

00:01:47

also other means like,

00:01:49

subsidies and so on,

00:01:51

so that they can

00:01:53

grow up and compete

00:01:56

with superior foreign

00:01:58

firms eventually.

00:02:00

But while they develop,

00:02:03

they need to be protected.

00:02:05

And, you know, the

00:02:06

hint is in the name.

00:02:07

I mean, it's

00:02:08

based on the idea

00:02:09

of child rearing.

00:02:10

Yeah.

00:02:11

Yeah.

00:02:12

I mean, in the

00:02:13

same way that

00:02:14

you could send your

00:02:16

kids to work at the

00:02:17

age of five or six as-

00:02:18

Yeah.

00:02:19

... the Victorians did

00:02:20

Many people did in history.

00:02:20

Yeah.

00:02:21

And that today many

00:02:23

countries are still doing,

00:02:25

many poor countries.

00:02:28

And that will, in the

00:02:29

short run, save you

00:02:30

money because you

00:02:31

don't have to pay

00:02:33

for the kids'

00:02:34

education, food, you know-

00:02:37

accommodation.

00:02:38

he will,

00:02:40

support himself, you know?

00:02:41

But this will mean

00:02:42

that, that this

00:02:43

guy can never become,

00:02:46

I don't know, nuclear

00:02:47

physicist or, economist

00:02:49

economist, yeah.

00:02:50

Yeah, that's right.

00:02:52

God forbid.

00:02:53

Yeah.

00:02:53

Architect, yeah.

00:02:55

He cannot become a high

00:02:56

productivity person, if

00:02:58

he doesn't go to school,

00:02:59

go to eventually

00:03:01

hopefully university.

00:03:02

Yeah.

00:03:03

So that you need to

00:03:04

send the kid

00:03:06

to school until it

00:03:07

kind of grows up-

00:03:09

Yeah.

00:03:09

and then that

00:03:11

push it into

00:03:12

the other labour market.

00:03:14

Yeah.

00:03:16

And, yeah, country after

00:03:18

country has succeeded

00:03:19

with this scheme and

00:03:21

Britain, in

00:03:23

the 18th and early 19th

00:03:25

century was still

00:03:26

not the leading

00:03:28

technological,

00:03:30

nation in Europe,

00:03:32

because at the time,

00:03:34

Belgium, the Netherlands,

00:03:35

parts of Italy were

00:03:36

ahead of Britain

00:03:37

in terms of technology.

00:03:39

Britain used protective

00:03:40

measures to grow its

00:03:42

domestic industries

00:03:44

in the 19th century and,

00:03:46

until the, really

00:03:48

Second World War.

00:03:50

The US had very high

00:03:51

tariffs, you know, 40, 50%.

00:03:53

Yeah.

00:03:54

So Trump tariff is

00:03:55

nothing compared to that

00:03:56

because that, at the time,

00:03:58

the US was, basically,

00:04:00

struggling against

00:04:01

British and other

00:04:02

European competition.

00:04:03

Yeah.

00:04:03

And this is idea th-

00:04:05

... which was actually

00:04:06

formalised by the

00:04:08

first finance minister

00:04:11

called the... they call

00:04:13

it the Treasury Secretary

00:04:14

in the country of the

00:04:15

United States of America.

00:04:16

Yeah.

00:04:17

Alexander Hamilton, the

00:04:18

guy on the $10 bill.

00:04:19

Yeah.

00:04:20

The guy who's

00:04:21

life has been made

00:04:22

into a hip hop musical.

00:04:23

Yeah.

00:04:24

Yeah.

00:04:25

So that this idea

00:04:27

has enabled many

00:04:29

nations, later, Germany,

00:04:31

Sweden, France,

00:04:35

Japan, Korea-

00:04:36

Yeah.

00:04:37

Taiwan-

00:04:37

Yeah.

00:04:37

all used this idea to

00:04:39

develop the industries.

00:04:40

to protect your-

00:04:41

Exactly.

00:04:41

young industries?

00:04:43

But what Trump is

00:04:43

doing is, is not that.

00:04:45

Exactly, yeah.

00:04:46

Yeah.

00:04:46

So it's like,

00:04:49

suddenly saying,

00:04:50

"Okay, I have this

00:04:52

45-year-old son who's

00:04:54

not doing very well."

00:04:55

"I'm going to

00:04:56

protect him."

00:04:57

Yeah.

00:04:57

Okay.

00:04:58

This is

00:04:59

nonsensical, yeah?

00:05:00

Yeah.

00:05:00

It is,

00:05:01

Also, you know, he seems

00:05:03

to think that, by using

00:05:04

tariff, you can make

00:05:06

other countries come

00:05:09

and invest in the US-

00:05:10

Yeah.

00:05:10

And I mean, yeah, it's

00:05:12

something that

00:05:13

has happened many, many

00:05:15

times in the past,

00:05:16

many developing countries

00:05:17

put up high tariff wall-

00:05:19

but, kind of,

00:05:22

that was partly

00:05:23

to encourage their

00:05:25

domestic producers.

00:05:26

But also,

00:05:27

to motivate

00:05:30

foreign companies to come

00:05:31

and set up factories.

00:05:33

So for example,

00:05:34

Brazil had a very high

00:05:35

protection against

00:05:37

foreign car imports

00:05:38

in the 1960s and '70s.

00:05:40

So Fiat, Ford, these

00:05:43

guys came and

00:05:44

built cars in Brazil, yeah?

00:05:46

Yeah.

00:05:46

So that isn't known

00:05:47

as tariff jumping.

00:05:49

So that Trump's

00:05:50

hope is that if

00:05:51

I set up this tariff

00:05:52

wall, Korean companies,

00:05:54

Japanese companies,

00:05:56

the German companies

00:05:57

are going to come and

00:05:58

produce their electric

00:05:59

cars and semiconductors

00:06:01

and... Yeah, some of it is

00:06:03

going to happen, but the

00:06:04

trouble is that this

00:06:06

is not going to be

00:06:08

even near enough

00:06:10

for the, well, what's

00:06:13

this expression, 'Making

00:06:14

America Great', you know?

00:06:16

Yeah.

00:06:16

And of course it will

00:06:17

raise the costs of-

00:06:18

Exactly.

00:06:19

Yeah.

00:06:19

So first of all,

00:06:22

you cannot kind of

00:06:24

rebuild these

00:06:25

industries by simply

00:06:29

having one factory here,

00:06:31

one factory there, because,

00:06:32

you know, in order

00:06:33

to have really high

00:06:35

productivity, you need

00:06:36

not just the factory

00:06:38

making the final product,

00:06:39

but a whole kind of

00:06:42

industrial ecosystem as

00:06:45

economists call it.

00:06:46

So you need workers

00:06:47

with the right skills,

00:06:49

infrastructure that is

00:06:50

suited to the industry,

00:06:52

even the university, the

00:06:54

departments are doing-

00:06:55

research in the area

00:06:56

that you are

00:06:57

specialising in.

00:06:59

So unless you have

00:07:00

this tissue of

00:07:01

support system,

00:07:03

you're not going to

00:07:04

achieve high productivity.

00:07:06

But, secondly

00:07:08

the most... something

00:07:10

that most people don't

00:07:11

even realise is that the

00:07:13

US financial system is

00:07:15

now so parasitic that

00:07:18

it's not going

00:07:19

to allow Mr.

00:07:24

Trump's plan to work

00:07:25

because, you know, the idea

00:07:27

is that when you give

00:07:28

protection, your domestic

00:07:30

companies will not only

00:07:31

have the protection

00:07:33

from foreign competition,

00:07:34

but also have

00:07:35

extra resources.

00:07:36

Yeah.

00:07:37

Because

00:07:38

they can charge more.

00:07:39

Yeah.

00:07:40

And the hope is that

00:07:42

they'll use that

00:07:43

resource to invest in

00:07:45

raising productivity,

00:07:46

which is what happened

00:07:47

in Japan, Korea, yeah.

00:07:50

Now, the US

00:07:51

financial system

00:07:54

is actually going to

00:07:56

drain this extra resource

00:07:58

from these companies

00:07:59

and make, the

00:08:01

income inequality

00:08:02

even worse, yeah?

00:08:04

So, yeah, because

00:08:06

in the last 25 years,

00:08:08

American, top

00:08:10

American corporations

00:08:12

have given away

00:08:15

something like 90 to

00:08:16

95% of their profits

00:08:18

to shareholders

00:08:19

through dividends and

00:08:21

more importantly,

00:08:22

stock buybacks, yeah?

00:08:24

Yeah.

00:08:24

So, you give

00:08:25

extra resources to

00:08:26

these companies, are

00:08:27

they going to invest?

00:08:28

No.

00:08:28

Their shareholders

00:08:29

will say, "Do more

00:08:30

stock buybacks, " yeah?

00:08:31

Yeah.

00:08:32

So you think it's gonna

00:08:32

lead to higher inequality?

00:08:34

Yeah, exactly, yeah.

00:08:36

On top of that, we'll

00:08:37

have until you,

00:08:40

kind of, build at

00:08:41

least some additional

00:08:43

industrial base, you are

00:08:44

going to have a serious

00:08:45

inflation problem, yeah?

00:08:47

Yeah.

00:08:47

I think it's also-

00:08:48

So this is

00:08:48

politically

00:08:50

unsustainable, no?

00:08:50

It's gonna be... It's

00:08:51

gonna make life

00:08:52

harder for poor people.

00:08:53

Yeah.

00:08:53

Exactly, yeah.

00:08:55

inflation, increasing

00:08:56

inequality,

00:08:57

and, you know, seriously, I

00:08:59

mean, you cannot rebuild

00:09:00

an industrial base

00:09:02

that had been eroded

00:09:03

for the last 40 years

00:09:04

within two,

00:09:05

three years, yeah?

00:09:06

It will take at least,

00:09:08

a couple of decades, yeah?

00:09:09

Yeah.

00:09:09

And these v- these

00:09:10

very, very broad tariffs

00:09:11

on almost everything.

00:09:13

Exactly.

00:09:13

Yeah.

00:09:13

It seems, uh...

00:09:14

That's right.

00:09:14

Yeah.

00:09:14

I mean, ,

00:09:14

It seems unwise

00:09:15

Yeah.

00:09:15

If a tariff is

00:09:17

going to work, it has

00:09:18

to be targeted, yeah?

00:09:19

Do you want to develop

00:09:20

automobile industry?

00:09:21

Yes.

00:09:21

Protect automobile

00:09:23

industry but

00:09:23

then making sure...

00:09:24

And then you can make sure you have

00:09:24

the workers for the industry...

00:09:25

Exactly.

00:09:26

Yeah.

00:09:27

Yeah.

00:09:27

There's no plan like that.

00:09:29

Yeah.

00:09:29

So...

00:09:29

So we don't think we're

00:09:31

gonna see an improvement

00:09:31

in living standards?

00:09:32

No, no, no.

00:09:33

No, no.

00:09:33

Neither do I

00:09:34

Yeah.

00:09:35

But, hopefully it

00:09:35

won't be that bad.

00:09:36

But, yeah.

00:09:37

Pessimistic.

00:09:38

Pessimistic

00:09:38

Yeah, I'm very pessimistic.

00:09:40

But, you know, one

00:09:41

good thing about

00:09:42

Trump is that he

00:09:43

has no ideology, yeah?

00:09:45

If it doesn't work,

00:09:45

he will change

00:09:46

his mind.

00:09:47

Yeah.

00:09:48

I do wonder... well, I

00:09:49

said this on the

00:09:49

channel before.

00:09:50

it's very hard to

00:09:51

guess from what Trump

00:09:52

says what Trump actually

00:09:54

is gonna do.

00:09:54

That's right

00:09:55

So, we hope he'll

00:09:56

roll back on this

00:09:57

because I think it would

00:09:57

be bad for everyone,

00:10:00

including Americans.

00:10:01

I suspect.

00:10:02

Yeah.