and uh gary is an equality uh inequality
economist<00:00:03.520> and<00:00:03.679> also<00:00:04.000> a<00:00:04.080> former<00:00:04.480> trader<00:00:04.799> and<00:00:04.880> i
economist and also a former trader and i
asked<00:00:05.200> him<00:00:05.279> whether<00:00:05.520> he<00:00:05.600> thought<00:00:06.080> this<00:00:06.399> was
out there who are low ages will be will
be<00:00:13.679> grateful<00:00:14.160> but<00:00:14.320> when<00:00:14.400> we<00:00:14.480> look<00:00:14.559> at<00:00:14.639> what's
food costs fuel costs petrol costs and
especially<00:00:22.640> people<00:00:22.880> who<00:00:22.960> might<00:00:23.119> have<00:00:23.199> been<00:00:23.359> on
especially people who might have been on
universal<00:00:23.840> credits<00:00:24.160> in<00:00:24.240> that<00:00:24.400> car<00:00:24.640> as<00:00:24.720> well
universal credits in that car as well
i<00:00:25.680> think<00:00:25.840> people<00:00:26.160> are<00:00:26.240> going<00:00:26.320> to<00:00:26.480> find<00:00:26.800> that
i think people are going to find that
life's<00:00:27.840> going<00:00:28.000> to<00:00:28.080> get<00:00:28.160> harder<00:00:28.400> in<00:00:28.480> the<00:00:28.560> future
life's going to get harder in the future
and<00:00:28.960> i<00:00:29.039> think<00:00:29.199> if<00:00:29.279> we<00:00:29.359> put<00:00:29.519> this<00:00:29.679> in<00:00:29.760> the
context of a coronavirus crisis which
has<00:00:31.920> seen<00:00:32.480> billionaire<00:00:32.960> wealth<00:00:33.200> go<00:00:33.280> up<00:00:33.360> by
has seen billionaire wealth go up by
over<00:00:33.760> 100<00:00:34.399> billion<00:00:34.800> pounds<00:00:35.440> i<00:00:35.520> think<00:00:35.680> there's
over 100 billion pounds i think there's
a<00:00:35.920> legitimate<00:00:36.480> question<00:00:36.719> to<00:00:36.880> be<00:00:37.040> asking<00:00:37.520> about
a legitimate question to be asking about
whether<00:00:38.079> more<00:00:38.320> needs<00:00:38.480> to<00:00:38.559> be<00:00:38.640> done<00:00:38.800> for<00:00:38.960> the
ordinary working people of this country
well<00:00:41.680> particularly<00:00:42.079> i<00:00:42.160> think<00:00:42.320> you<00:00:42.399> know<00:00:42.559> given
many people rather like the government
are<00:00:45.200> in<00:00:45.520> debt<00:00:46.000> and<00:00:46.320> uh<00:00:46.640> maybe<00:00:46.960> don't<00:00:47.280> always
are in debt and uh maybe don't always
get<00:00:47.840> the<00:00:48.320> number<00:00:48.559> of<00:00:48.719> hours<00:00:49.280> per<00:00:49.440> week<00:00:49.840> that
get the number of hours per week that
they<00:00:50.160> need<00:00:50.480> and<00:00:50.640> it<00:00:50.719> still<00:00:50.960> strikes<00:00:51.360> me<00:00:51.520> that
they need and it still strikes me that
it<00:00:51.760> must<00:00:51.920> be<00:00:52.480> very<00:00:52.800> very<00:00:53.199> difficult<00:00:53.840> to<00:00:54.320> live
it must be very very difficult to live
on<00:00:55.039> a<00:00:55.199> wage<00:00:56.000> of<00:00:56.640> of<00:00:56.800> nine<00:00:57.039> pounds<00:00:57.360> 18<00:00:57.760> an<00:00:57.920> hour
on a wage of of nine pounds 18 an hour
yeah<00:01:00.480> i<00:01:00.559> mean<00:01:00.800> i<00:01:01.039> i<00:01:01.280> am<00:01:01.840> i<00:01:02.000> wrote<00:01:02.160> a<00:01:02.239> letter<00:01:02.399> with
yeah i mean i i am i wrote a letter with
the<00:01:02.559> group<00:01:02.800> today<00:01:02.960> to<00:01:03.120> the<00:01:03.199> chancellor<00:01:03.680> to<00:01:03.760> say
and perhaps shift that burden towards
richer<00:01:11.200> people<00:01:11.600> and<00:01:11.920> i've<00:01:12.159> had<00:01:12.240> so<00:01:12.400> many
we're out here working every day
struggling<00:01:18.240> just<00:01:18.400> to<00:01:18.479> put<00:01:18.640> food<00:01:18.880> on<00:01:18.960> the<00:01:19.040> table
struggling just to put food on the table
and<00:01:19.439> it's<00:01:19.600> just<00:01:19.759> getting<00:01:20.000> harder<00:01:20.400> and<00:01:20.640> um
we need to look at that
and<00:01:24.640> ask<00:01:24.880> why<00:01:25.119> have<00:01:25.200> they<00:01:25.360> raised<00:01:25.520> taxes<00:01:25.920> on
billionaires and the question has to be
asked<00:01:31.920> you<00:01:32.000> know<00:01:32.560> our<00:01:32.799> chances<00:01:33.200> of<00:01:33.360> family<00:01:33.759> are
asked you know our chances of family are
billionaires<00:01:35.040> is<00:01:35.200> this<00:01:35.439> one<00:01:35.600> of<00:01:35.680> the<00:01:35.759> reasons
billionaires is this one of the reasons
why<00:01:36.479> richie<00:01:36.799> turner<00:01:37.040> has<00:01:37.200> chosen<00:01:37.520> to<00:01:37.680> tax
who've seen their wealth explode during
the<00:01:42.399> crisis<00:01:43.200> do<00:01:43.280> you<00:01:43.360> think<00:01:43.600> this<00:01:43.759> is<00:01:43.920> likely
to gain rishi sunak any popularity
amongst<00:01:47.600> those<00:01:47.920> people<00:01:48.479> who<00:01:48.720> it<00:01:48.880> affects<00:01:49.280> or
amongst those people who it affects or
would<00:01:49.680> it<00:01:50.000> be<00:01:50.159> seen<00:01:50.560> rather<00:01:50.960> more<00:01:51.200> cynically
would it be seen rather more cynically
simply<00:01:52.399> as<00:01:52.560> a<00:01:52.720> token<00:01:53.119> increase<00:01:53.680> rather<00:01:54.079> like
simply as a token increase rather like
uh<00:01:54.720> many<00:01:54.960> workers<00:01:55.360> in<00:01:55.439> the<00:01:55.520> ns<00:01:56.000> nhs<00:01:56.479> or<00:01:56.640> the
ago
well<00:02:00.240> i<00:02:00.320> think<00:02:00.479> a<00:02:00.560> lot<00:02:00.719> of<00:02:00.799> people<00:02:01.119> are<00:02:01.680> you
well i think a lot of people are you
know<00:02:02.399> people<00:02:02.719> are<00:02:02.799> on<00:02:02.880> the<00:02:02.960> tough<00:02:03.200> end<00:02:03.360> of
know people are on the tough end of
things<00:02:03.600> here<00:02:03.840> they<00:02:04.000> can<00:02:04.159> see<00:02:04.399> that<00:02:04.719> they've
things here they can see that they've
been<00:02:05.040> given<00:02:05.280> with<00:02:05.439> one<00:02:05.600> hand<00:02:05.759> and<00:02:05.840> taken<00:02:06.079> away
been given with one hand and taken away
with<00:02:06.399> the<00:02:06.479> other<00:02:06.880> it's<00:02:07.119> exactly<00:02:07.439> as<00:02:07.600> i've<00:02:07.680> said
with the other it's exactly as i've said
you<00:02:08.000> know<00:02:08.560> universal<00:02:08.959> credit<00:02:09.200> has<00:02:09.280> been<00:02:09.440> cut
you know universal credit has been cut
from<00:02:09.840> the<00:02:09.920> families<00:02:10.319> most<00:02:10.640> in<00:02:10.720> these<00:02:11.360> national
from the families most in these national
insurance<00:02:12.080> has<00:02:12.160> been<00:02:12.720> risen<00:02:13.280> on<00:02:13.840> that<00:02:14.000> starts
insurance has been risen on that starts
on<00:02:14.480> workers<00:02:14.879> 9<00:02:15.200> 000<00:02:15.360> pounds<00:02:15.599> a<00:02:15.760> year<00:02:16.239> and<00:02:16.400> at
the same time billionaires have been
excluded<00:02:18.560> the<00:02:18.720> message<00:02:19.040> i<00:02:19.120> want<00:02:19.200> to<00:02:19.280> tell
these people because i think ordinary
people<00:02:21.360> they<00:02:21.520> see<00:02:21.680> how<00:02:21.760> hard<00:02:21.920> it<00:02:22.000> is<00:02:22.080> for<00:02:22.239> them
people they see how hard it is for them
but<00:02:22.800> what<00:02:22.959> they<00:02:23.120> don't<00:02:23.360> realize<00:02:23.760> is<00:02:24.000> just<00:02:24.400> how
much money billionaires have made in
this<00:02:26.319> crisis<00:02:26.959> the<00:02:27.120> top<00:02:27.440> three<00:02:27.760> families<00:02:28.160> in
this crisis the top three families in
this<00:02:28.400> country<00:02:28.959> the<00:02:29.120> mittels<00:02:29.680> the<00:02:29.760> reubens<00:02:30.160> and
this country the mittels the reubens and
the<00:02:30.319> blavatniks<00:02:31.280> increased<00:02:31.680> their<00:02:31.840> wealth<00:02:32.080> by
20 billion pounds during the pandemic
that's<00:02:34.959> 20<00:02:35.440> 000<00:02:35.680> million<00:02:36.080> pounds<00:02:36.560> and<00:02:36.640> the
national insurance rise is supposed to
raise<00:02:38.400> 10<00:02:38.640> billion<00:02:39.040> pounds<00:02:39.280> a<00:02:39.360> year<00:02:39.680> so<00:02:39.840> this
raise 10 billion pounds a year so this
tax<00:02:40.319> which<00:02:40.480> has<00:02:40.560> been<00:02:40.720> risen<00:02:40.959> from<00:02:41.120> ordinary
tax which has been risen from ordinary
people<00:02:42.000> they<00:02:42.160> could<00:02:42.319> have<00:02:42.480> risen<00:02:42.720> that<00:02:43.200> twice
people they could have risen that twice
over<00:02:44.160> from<00:02:44.400> three<00:02:44.800> families<00:02:45.680> and<00:02:45.840> made<00:02:46.000> them
over from three families and made them
just<00:02:46.480> as<00:02:46.640> rich<00:02:46.879> as<00:02:46.959> they<00:02:47.040> were<00:02:47.200> before<00:02:47.440> the
just as rich as they were before the
pandemic<00:02:48.000> and<00:02:48.080> had<00:02:48.239> enough<00:02:48.480> money<00:02:48.720> left<00:02:48.879> to<00:02:48.959> by
cristiano ronaldo 35 times
if<00:02:52.400> indeed<00:02:52.720> you'd<00:02:52.879> want<00:02:53.040> to<00:02:53.120> do<00:02:53.200> that<00:02:53.440> i
if indeed you'd want to do that i
suppose<00:02:53.760> some<00:02:53.920> people<00:02:54.239> would<00:02:54.879> if<00:02:55.040> they<00:02:55.120> were
suppose some people would if they were
if<00:02:55.519> they<00:02:55.680> were<00:02:55.760> interested<00:02:56.160> in<00:02:56.239> football<00:02:56.959> i'm
if they were interested in football i'm
not<00:02:57.360> personally<00:02:58.239> but<00:02:58.640> you<00:02:58.800> know<00:02:59.040> is<00:02:59.200> there
knows how many occasions in his
existence<00:03:09.280> of<00:03:09.840> making<00:03:10.640> taxes<00:03:11.200> higher<00:03:11.519> for<00:03:11.680> the
either universal credit or the national
living<00:03:17.519> rage<00:03:17.920> buy<00:03:18.080> more<00:03:18.239> than<00:03:18.400> he<00:03:18.560> has
living rage buy more than he has
yeah<00:03:20.400> first<00:03:20.640> things<00:03:20.879> first<00:03:21.440> go<00:03:21.680> back<00:03:21.840> and
revisit this national insurance right
this<00:03:23.599> is<00:03:24.000> low<00:03:24.239> paid<00:03:24.560> workers<00:03:25.440> paying<00:03:25.840> tax<00:03:26.400> and
this is low paid workers paying tax and
and<00:03:26.799> move<00:03:27.280> shift<00:03:27.519> that<00:03:27.599> focus<00:03:28.000> to<00:03:28.080> the
billionaires are sometimes paying lower
rates<00:03:34.239> than<00:03:34.400> their<00:03:34.560> cleaners<00:03:35.200> this<00:03:35.440> is<00:03:35.519> not
rates than their cleaners this is not
acceptable<00:03:36.159> and<00:03:36.239> it<00:03:36.319> leads<00:03:36.480> to<00:03:36.560> a<00:03:36.640> situation
where ordinary people are seeing money
sucked<00:03:39.200> out<00:03:39.280> of<00:03:39.360> their<00:03:39.519> pockets<00:03:40.159> and<00:03:40.319> put<00:03:40.480> into
pockets of billionaires but what does
that<00:03:42.000> do<00:03:42.159> to<00:03:42.239> the<00:03:42.400> economy<00:03:42.959> ordinary<00:03:43.519> people
that do to the economy ordinary people
to<00:03:43.840> spend<00:03:44.159> that<00:03:44.560> in<00:03:44.720> businesses<00:03:45.280> local<00:03:45.599> shops
to spend that in businesses local shops
billionaires<00:03:46.799> are<00:03:46.879> just<00:03:47.040> going<00:03:47.120> to<00:03:47.280> use<00:03:47.440> that
billionaires are just going to use that
to<00:03:48.239> buy<00:03:48.400> our<00:03:48.560> mom's<00:03:48.799> houses<00:03:49.200> and<00:03:49.280> push<00:03:49.440> the
what about something you mentioned
earlier<00:03:53.120> on<00:03:53.280> and<00:03:53.680> that<00:03:53.920> is<00:03:54.239> universal<00:03:54.720> credit
earlier on and that is universal credit
which<00:03:55.280> as<00:03:55.439> far<00:03:55.680> as<00:03:55.840> i<00:03:56.000> can<00:03:56.319> as<00:03:56.480> far<00:03:56.640> as<00:03:56.799> i<00:03:56.959> know
which as far as i can as far as i know
um<00:03:58.239> if<00:03:58.560> you're<00:03:58.799> earning<00:03:59.120> you<00:03:59.200> know<00:03:59.360> pretty
um if you're earning you know pretty
much<00:03:59.840> nothing<00:04:00.239> per<00:04:00.400> month<00:04:00.640> you<00:04:00.879> you<00:04:01.040> get<00:04:01.200> 400
much nothing per month you you get 400
pounds<00:04:02.080> in<00:04:02.159> the<00:04:02.239> region<00:04:02.480> of<00:04:02.560> 400<00:04:03.040> pounds<00:04:03.280> a
pounds in the region of 400 pounds a
month<00:04:03.599> now<00:04:04.080> see<00:04:04.239> once<00:04:04.560> again<00:04:05.200> um<00:04:05.680> in<00:04:05.920> terms<00:04:06.480> of
month now see once again um in terms of
a<00:04:07.200> social<00:04:07.519> security<00:04:08.080> payment<00:04:08.400> as<00:04:08.640> we<00:04:08.879> used<00:04:09.040> to
a social security payment as we used to
perhaps<00:04:09.519> call<00:04:09.760> it<00:04:09.920> i<00:04:10.000> know<00:04:10.159> it's<00:04:10.319> not<00:04:10.480> quite
perhaps call it i know it's not quite
the<00:04:10.799> same<00:04:11.360> system<00:04:11.680> these<00:04:11.920> days<00:04:12.159> that<00:04:12.319> strikes
me as very little
yeah<00:04:15.200> and<00:04:15.519> one<00:04:15.680> thing<00:04:15.840> i<00:04:15.920> just<00:04:16.079> want<00:04:16.160> to<00:04:16.239> make
yeah and one thing i just want to make
clear<00:04:16.639> because<00:04:16.959> i<00:04:17.199> know<00:04:17.440> some<00:04:17.600> people<00:04:17.759> are
clear because i know some people are
aware<00:04:18.079> of<00:04:18.160> this<00:04:18.239> but<00:04:18.400> some<00:04:18.560> people<00:04:18.799> might<00:04:18.959> not
aware of this but some people might not
be<00:04:19.519> a<00:04:19.759> huge<00:04:20.079> percentage<00:04:20.720> i<00:04:20.799> think<00:04:20.959> is<00:04:21.120> about<00:04:21.280> 40
recipients are working people and they
have<00:04:25.280> to<00:04:25.440> receive<00:04:25.759> this<00:04:25.919> because<00:04:26.160> wages<00:04:26.560> are
have to receive this because wages are
so<00:04:27.120> low<00:04:27.520> for<00:04:27.680> so<00:04:27.919> many<00:04:28.160> people<00:04:28.560> and<00:04:28.720> living
so low for so many people and living
costs<00:04:29.440> so<00:04:29.680> high<00:04:30.240> that<00:04:30.479> they<00:04:30.560> can't<00:04:30.800> afford
costs so high that they can't afford
even<00:04:31.360> though<00:04:31.520> they're<00:04:31.680> working<00:04:32.240> to<00:04:32.400> take<00:04:32.639> care
even though they're working to take care
of<00:04:32.880> a<00:04:32.960> family<00:04:33.440> you<00:04:33.520> know<00:04:33.759> this<00:04:34.000> is<00:04:34.479> a
of a family you know this is a
ridiculous<00:04:34.960> system<00:04:35.280> and<00:04:35.360> it<00:04:35.440> needs<00:04:35.680> to<00:04:35.759> be
ridiculous system and it needs to be
changed<00:04:36.720> straight<00:04:36.960> away<00:04:37.120> we<00:04:37.199> should<00:04:37.360> look<00:04:37.520> at
changed straight away we should look at
the<00:04:37.680> taxes<00:04:38.000> these<00:04:38.240> people<00:04:38.400> pay<00:04:38.560> and<00:04:38.639> we<00:04:38.720> should
the taxes these people pay and we should
reduce<00:04:39.280> them<00:04:39.840> straight<00:04:40.080> away<00:04:40.720> the<00:04:40.800> fact<00:04:41.040> that
they're playing national insurance when
they<00:04:42.639> at<00:04:42.800> nine<00:04:43.040> thousand<00:04:43.360> pounds<00:04:43.680> that<00:04:43.919> you
cannot support family on nine thousand
pounds<00:04:46.400> take<00:04:46.720> these<00:04:46.880> guys<00:04:47.199> out<00:04:47.280> of<00:04:47.360> the<00:04:47.440> tax
unfortunately our chance of the family
are<00:04:58.160> billionaires<00:04:58.720> and<00:04:58.800> if<00:04:58.880> you<00:04:59.040> are<00:04:59.120> a
be paid by builders and cleaners
what<00:05:04.240> about<00:05:04.720> let's<00:05:05.039> think<00:05:05.199> about<00:05:05.440> it<00:05:05.520> from<00:05:05.919> the
what about let's think about it from the
the<00:05:06.320> other<00:05:06.560> side<00:05:06.800> of<00:05:06.880> the<00:05:06.960> coin<00:05:07.280> if<00:05:07.360> you<00:05:07.440> like
the other side of the coin if you like
what<00:05:07.759> about<00:05:08.320> um<00:05:08.800> small<00:05:09.199> employers<00:05:09.840> um<00:05:10.160> who<00:05:10.400> may
increase in the national living wage
well<00:05:16.720> i<00:05:16.800> mean<00:05:17.039> i<00:05:17.120> think<00:05:17.199> this<00:05:17.440> goes<00:05:17.600> back<00:05:17.759> down
well i mean i think this goes back down
to<00:05:18.000> the<00:05:18.080> economy<00:05:18.560> you<00:05:18.639> know<00:05:18.960> we<00:05:19.120> need<00:05:19.280> to<00:05:19.520> of
to the economy you know we need to of
course<00:05:19.840> we<00:05:19.919> need<00:05:20.000> to<00:05:20.080> support<00:05:20.400> some<00:05:20.479> more
these small employers as well but
the<00:05:31.520> question<00:05:31.840> ultimately<00:05:32.320> is<00:05:32.479> that<00:05:32.880> who<00:05:33.280> is
the question ultimately is that who is
it<00:05:33.520> who<00:05:33.600> has<00:05:33.759> the<00:05:33.840> money<00:05:34.080> here<00:05:34.160> you<00:05:34.320> mentioned
the government debt right government
debt<00:05:35.840> as<00:05:36.000> you<00:05:36.080> know<00:05:36.320> has<00:05:36.560> increased<00:05:37.199> by<00:05:37.440> 450
billion pounds during the pandemic
that's<00:05:40.160> enormous<00:05:40.479> that's<00:05:40.720> 10<00:05:40.960> 000<00:05:41.199> pounds<00:05:41.680> per
person okay well who do we owe that
money<00:05:43.840> to<00:05:44.000> you<00:05:44.080> know<00:05:44.160> we<00:05:44.320> don't<00:05:44.479> owe<00:05:44.639> it<00:05:44.720> to
ordinary people are struggling all of
that<00:05:54.320> money<00:05:54.639> all<00:05:54.720> of<00:05:54.800> that<00:05:54.960> debt<00:05:55.199> is<00:05:55.440> to<00:05:55.680> the
that money all of that debt is to the
billionaires<00:05:56.479> this<00:05:56.720> is<00:05:56.800> where<00:05:56.960> the<00:05:57.039> money<00:05:57.360> is
billionaires this is where the money is
this<00:05:57.919> is<00:05:58.000> where<00:05:58.160> the<00:05:58.240> wealth<00:05:58.560> is<00:05:58.880> this<00:05:59.120> is
this is where the wealth is this is
where<00:05:59.280> the<00:05:59.440> spending<00:05:59.759> power<00:06:00.000> is<00:06:00.240> if<00:06:00.400> you<00:06:00.479> want
where the spending power is if you want
a<00:06:00.639> strong<00:06:00.800> economy<00:06:01.440> you<00:06:01.680> have<00:06:02.000> to<00:06:02.240> find<00:06:02.479> a<00:06:02.560> way
a strong economy you have to find a way
to<00:06:02.880> tax<00:06:03.120> them<00:06:03.280> i<00:06:03.440> know<00:06:03.600> i'm<00:06:03.840> nailing<00:06:04.240> the
to tax them i know i'm nailing the
hammer<00:06:04.560> on<00:06:04.639> their<00:06:04.720> heads<00:06:04.960> here<00:06:05.039> but<00:06:05.199> but<00:06:05.520> you
hammer on their heads here but but you
know<00:06:05.759> i'm<00:06:05.919> an<00:06:06.000> economist<00:06:06.560> i've<00:06:06.639> made<00:06:06.800> lots<00:06:06.960> of
know i'm an economist i've made lots of
money<00:06:07.280> betting<00:06:07.520> on<00:06:07.600> these<00:06:07.759> things<00:06:08.240> if<00:06:08.400> we
money betting on these things if we
don't<00:06:08.639> find<00:06:08.800> a<00:06:08.880> way<00:06:09.039> to<00:06:09.120> tax<00:06:09.280> the<00:06:09.360> billionaires
don't find a way to tax the billionaires
it's<00:06:10.319> going<00:06:10.479> to<00:06:10.560> be<00:06:10.720> a<00:06:10.880> very<00:06:11.199> difficult
it's going to be a very difficult
economy<00:06:12.080> for<00:06:12.240> the<00:06:12.319> rest<00:06:12.560> of<00:06:12.720> us<00:06:12.880> and<00:06:13.039> just
economy for the rest of us and just
finally<00:06:13.840> uh<00:06:14.080> tell<00:06:14.240> me<00:06:14.400> gary<00:06:14.720> how<00:06:14.880> you<00:06:15.039> feel
finally uh tell me gary how you feel
this<00:06:15.440> will<00:06:15.680> play<00:06:16.319> in<00:06:16.479> the<00:06:16.639> house<00:06:16.960> when<00:06:17.120> it's
this will play in the house when it's
announced<00:06:18.000> tomorrow<00:06:18.479> in<00:06:18.560> the<00:06:18.639> in<00:06:18.800> the<00:06:18.880> budget
how will the labour party respond
well<00:06:22.400> i'm<00:06:22.479> not<00:06:22.639> sure<00:06:23.280> i'm<00:06:23.360> not<00:06:23.600> too<00:06:23.840> well
well i'm not sure i'm not too well
connected<00:06:24.319> with<00:06:24.400> a<00:06:24.479> labor<00:06:24.639> party<00:06:24.880> i<00:06:24.960> know
connected with a labor party i know
there's<00:06:25.280> lots<00:06:25.440> of<00:06:25.520> different<00:06:25.759> people<00:06:26.000> lots<00:06:26.240> of
there's lots of different people lots of
different<00:06:26.639> views<00:06:26.960> um<00:06:27.440> you<00:06:27.600> know<00:06:27.680> i<00:06:27.759> would
different views um you know i would
imagine<00:06:28.319> of<00:06:28.479> course<00:06:28.639> they<00:06:28.800> will<00:06:28.960> support<00:06:29.280> a
i would suggest that they question
whether<00:06:32.720> this<00:06:32.880> rise<00:06:33.199> will<00:06:33.360> be<00:06:33.520> enough<00:06:34.240> to
here and i would
suggest<00:06:39.600> that<00:06:39.759> they<00:06:40.000> say<00:06:40.400> yes<00:06:40.720> it's<00:06:40.880> good<00:06:41.039> to
suggest that they say yes it's good to
raise<00:06:41.360> the<00:06:41.440> minimum<00:06:41.840> wage<00:06:42.240> but<00:06:42.400> it's<00:06:42.560> not
raise the minimum wage but it's not
going<00:06:42.800> to<00:06:42.880> be<00:06:42.960> enough<00:06:43.280> and<00:06:43.360> we<00:06:43.440> need<00:06:43.600> to<00:06:43.680> do
going to be enough and we need to do
more<00:06:44.080> to<00:06:44.240> help<00:06:44.639> the<00:06:44.800> ordinary<00:06:45.360> hard<00:06:45.520> working
more to help the ordinary hard working
families<00:06:46.240> of<00:06:46.319> this<00:06:46.479> country<00:06:47.120> all<00:06:47.199> right<00:06:47.360> that
was a gary stevenson an inequality
economist<00:06:50.240> and<00:06:50.319> an<00:06:50.479> economist<00:06:51.360> and<00:06:51.599> a<00:06:51.840> former
economist and an economist and a former
trader<00:06:52.960> um<00:06:53.280> discussing<00:06:53.680> this<00:06:53.919> morning<00:06:54.160> on<00:06:54.319> lbc
trader um discussing this morning on lbc
the<00:06:55.440> rise<00:06:55.840> that<00:06:55.919> will<00:06:56.000> be<00:06:56.080> announced<00:06:56.479> tomorrow
national living wage to nine pounds
fifty<00:07:00.960> if<00:07:01.120> you<00:07:01.280> are<00:07:01.440> over<00:07:01.919> 23.<00:07:02.560> do<00:07:02.720> you<00:07:02.960> feel
fifty if you are over 23. do you feel
that<00:07:03.599> that<00:07:04.240> is<00:07:04.639> enough<00:07:04.960> do<00:07:05.120> you<00:07:05.280> welcome<00:07:05.680> at
that that is enough do you welcome at
the<00:07:05.919> rise<00:07:06.720> are<00:07:06.880> you<00:07:07.039> somebody<00:07:07.599> who<00:07:07.840> feels
are you somebody who's struggling to
make<00:07:13.919> ends<00:07:14.240> meet<00:07:14.880> oh<00:07:15.120> three<00:07:15.280> four<00:07:15.520> five<00:07:15.759> six<00:07:16.000> oh
make ends meet oh three four five six oh
six<00:07:16.400> oh<00:07:16.560> nine<00:07:16.720> seven<00:07:16.960> three<00:07:17.280> back<00:07:17.440> in<00:07:17.520> a<00:07:17.599> few
housing could be so much more affordable
wages<00:07:24.160> could<00:07:24.319> be<00:07:24.479> so<00:07:24.720> much<00:07:24.960> higher<00:07:25.520> and<00:07:25.680> we
wages could be so much higher and we
could<00:07:25.919> have<00:07:26.080> so<00:07:26.240> many<00:07:26.479> more<00:07:26.720> options<00:07:27.360> in<00:07:27.440> how
could have so many more options in how
we<00:07:27.759> live<00:07:27.919> our<00:07:28.080> lives<00:07:28.400> some<00:07:28.560> of<00:07:28.639> them<00:07:28.800> put<00:07:28.960> a<00:07:29.039> lot
of money into paying economists and
think<00:07:30.960> tanks<00:07:31.280> to<00:07:31.360> tell<00:07:31.599> you<00:07:32.000> that<00:07:32.160> inequality