Wealth InequalityEnough is EnoughTax Wealth Not WorkEconomics of CovidRich get RicherPoor get PoorerEconomics ExplainedTax the RichEnd AusterityBillionairePoverty
But I don't do this because it's easy. I
do<00:00:03.120> this<00:00:03.520> because<00:00:03.840> it's<00:00:04.319> essential.<00:00:05.359> This<00:00:05.440> is
do this because it's essential. This is
as<00:00:05.759> simple<00:00:05.920> as<00:00:06.080> that.<00:00:06.480> It's<00:00:06.720> as<00:00:06.879> simple<00:00:07.040> as
as simple as that. It's as simple as
that.<00:00:07.520> If<00:00:07.680> you<00:00:07.839> if<00:00:08.000> you<00:00:08.160> don't<00:00:08.320> want<00:00:08.559> your
country to collapse into poverty, you
have<00:00:10.480> to<00:00:10.639> deal<00:00:10.800> with<00:00:10.960> this.<00:00:11.440> We've<00:00:11.679> got<00:00:11.759> the
have to deal with this. We've got the
people.<00:00:12.480> We've<00:00:12.639> got<00:00:12.719> the<00:00:12.960> experts.<00:00:13.519> Get<00:00:13.759> them
people. We've got the experts. Get them
in<00:00:14.000> a<00:00:14.320> room<00:00:14.559> together.<00:00:15.040> Pay<00:00:15.280> them<00:00:15.440> what<00:00:15.599> they
in a room together. Pay them what they
need<00:00:16.160> and<00:00:16.480> get<00:00:16.640> that<00:00:16.880> tax<00:00:17.199> policy<00:00:18.000> sorted<00:00:18.400> and
need and get that tax policy sorted and
and<00:00:18.800> give<00:00:18.960> it<00:00:19.119> the<00:00:19.279> time<00:00:19.359> it<00:00:19.600> needs.<00:00:20.080> And<00:00:20.240> I
and give it the time it needs. And I
would<00:00:20.560> like<00:00:20.720> to<00:00:20.880> see,<00:00:21.119> you<00:00:21.199> know,<00:00:21.359> this<00:00:21.520> is<00:00:21.600> not
would like to see, you know, this is not
a<00:00:21.840> UK<00:00:22.160> specific<00:00:22.480> problem.<00:00:23.119> I<00:00:23.439> want<00:00:23.519> to<00:00:23.680> see
servants in Germany, in Italy, in Spain,
in<00:00:28.720> France,<00:00:29.199> in<00:00:29.359> Japan,<00:00:29.760> in<00:00:30.000> Australia.<00:00:30.640> I
in France, in Japan, in Australia. I
would<00:00:31.039> say<00:00:31.199> America,<00:00:31.599> but<00:00:31.760> we're<00:00:31.920> not<00:00:32.079> likely
would say America, but we're not likely
to<00:00:32.399> get<00:00:32.480> them.<00:00:32.800> Oh,<00:00:32.960> and<00:00:33.200> Canada<00:00:33.520> because<00:00:33.680> they
always complain that I don't mention
them.<00:00:35.280> And<00:00:35.520> New<00:00:35.600> Zealand<00:00:35.920> to<00:00:36.079> get<00:00:36.160> a<00:00:36.239> lot<00:00:36.320> of
them. And New Zealand to get a lot of
those.<00:00:36.719> Listen,<00:00:37.760> what<00:00:38.000> I'm<00:00:38.239> looking<00:00:38.399> for<00:00:38.640> is
pragmatism. How do we effectively get
wealth<00:00:45.600> back<00:00:45.840> from<00:00:46.000> the<00:00:46.079> very<00:00:46.320> rich<00:00:46.879> or<00:00:47.200> at<00:00:47.360> the
wealth back from the very rich or at the
very<00:00:47.760> least<00:00:48.160> stop<00:00:48.399> them<00:00:48.640> from<00:00:48.800> taking<00:00:49.039> more<00:00:49.280> of