Does GDP Matter to Ordinary People?
*so again the economy is doing well but 'we' are not, is it conversely possible for*
*us to do well yeah for the economy to falter?* I mean in a sense it's a question on semantics
and a question on linguistics, I personally think that a good economy is people's lives
being good, I think that's... you know I don't think... I think they are the same thing but
you can definitely have a situation where GDP is rising and people's lives are getting worse 100%
you can have that and I think that is I mean GDP now is much higher than it was 50-60 years ago
but in many ways people's lives are worse than they were 60 years ago; they work longer hours,
they have much less leisure time, in many cases they're squeezed into smaller housing,
they're much more financially insecure; some things have gotten better of course you know there's been
technological advancements you know holidays to Asia are cheaper and a lot of white goods are
cheaper you know obviously we have computing power we didn't have back then but you know in terms
of financial security you know I look at my dad with no advanced education and you know god bless you
dad no particular marketable skills, he was able to buy a house and raise a family you know nowadays
you have people who are homeless doing that kind of job you know what I mean you know so I think in
many ways life has gone worse so I always remember there was um a great moment in the brexit debate
where I think it was George Osborne was on I don't know Question Time saying 'if we leave
the EU GDP is going to go down' I don't know 4.7% or whatever and some woman stood up in the crowd
and she shouted 'that's your GDP' and um I f***in loved it I thought it was amazing this is like
such a powerful statement for the reclamation of economics and economic ideas for the f***ing people
who gives a f*** if GDP is going up if life is getting worse and worse for the majority
of the people, it doesn't f***in matter does it? it doesn't f***in matter so um I think that
because economists tend to focus on very narrow metrics you know if you look at the last 20 years
okay maybe not the last two years but before that; growing GDP, low unemployment, low steady
inflation; in the eyes of most economists that is a good economy okay maybe it's not excellent
economy but it's a good economy but if you look actually what's happening to ordinary families
harder to get a well-paying job, harder to be able to support a family, longer working hours
much harder to afford housing, so many parts of this country and and this continent and
the world which used to be able to house good reliable jobs for families you can't even live
there anymore it's hard to get a job you know what I mean? yes it's not working for ordinary people but
um yeah it's it's to focus just on GDP is a madness and I think I think um you need to
you know (Thomas) Kane said that to be a good economist requires a great variety
of skills and I think yeah you need to be able to look at GDP and understand it but it's just
one measure and if GDP is going up and life is getting worse then who the f*** really cares
*so I mean like it is a case of semantics and how you phrase it but if the problem is that
in the public sector we're not very good at finding out the good economists and rewarding them
but in the private sector they are how do they identify good economists?*
predictors! predictors! well in markets it's just...
you set them out you compete against one another and who's the guy who's getting them
making the predictions right? who is the guy... that's why I'm so focused on... *what GDP?*
it could be anything it could be anything so you know I was specifically and it's it's not just
that your predictions are right what they look for what markets effectively reward is people who are
very good uh making predictions that are right and everybody thought they were wrong so if everybody
knows something's going to happen you don't make no money betting on it so my big trade was
back in sort of early 2011 I said interest rates will be zero for f***in five years nobody thought
that back then, nobody thought that back then, but I could see ordinary people are getting f***ed
here and you're never going to have a recovery if people don't have any f***in money to spend you
know what I mean and um it wasn't that complicated really but nobody could see that nobody could
see that and I think what you have there is another big problem in economics which is that
top level economists either ones that come from prestigious universities and get the prestigious
jobs overwhelmingly living lives where they are from elite universities, elite private schools,
rich families.. everybody I know is from that background and they have no f***in idea what's
happening in the real world they've got no f***in idea so you have this whole world of economics
where nobody knows what's f***in happening in their lives of ordinary people with regards..
it is crazy it is.. this is.. It's.. and you know you look at it and it's sometimes it's
profoundly depressing I think you have to look for the humour in it in a way you know you look at these
guys like George Osborne and like Andrew Bailey and you know they look so smart in their suits they don't
know what the f*** they're doing they do not know what the f*** and the worst of it is they
don't even know they don't know that's how bad they are that is seriously this and and nobody
no good trader in the city gives a f*** about them they know we know that they're a bunch of idiots
*scary* it's scary but you know you got me you got me you know you you know you won't find
many who have a better understanding *in many ways though and I'm sure maybe viewers would share this..*
*I wonder if maybe not having you would be better ignorance is bliss* no no I don't I don't believe that
I don't believe ignorance is bliss I think that there is a profound strength and dignity that
comes from working hard to understand the situation that you are in even if it is bad